How do we keep both QBs?
- Thread starter HomerChampless
- Start date
guffus
Well-Known Member
I object! Although both doctors and lawyers have high IQ'S compared to the general public, doctors have a higher average IQ than lawyers. The range is similar, but overall average favors doctors.
HomerChampless
Well-Known Member
Why not a free for all? At least, doctors don't usually allow politics to influence their judgements...
Nope, just their pocketbooks. #bigpharmadollarsfordocs
shonblatt
Well-Known Member
1. Banks showed his physical gifts the year before, but in spot duty made some really boneheaded plays.
2. Stanzi beat out Christensen; if you're referring to '07, barring disaster Kirk just won't ever put in a freshman QB, no matter what the talent gap appears to be.
3. I do question the Vandenberg decision, but Rudock was a freshman and Kirk had to believe that JVB would figure out the offense at some point with his history.
1. It doesn't matter if he made some boneheaded plays, the offense was a lot better when Banks was in, and he would have learned from his mistakes sooner if he would have played more.
2. It took losing a game at PITT before KF finally figured it out. Much like Iowa losing to ISU this year, BUT KF still wouldn't have made the change if JR didn't get hurt, so we most likely would've suffered back to back losses and then who knows?
3. I actually understand the JVB decision the most. He had proven he could do it, but he just never picked it up. Why KF didn't get JR some snaps that season is really hard to believe. We weren't going to do anything that year, so start thinking about the future and get some reps for somebody who might be able to play the following year.
17>7 Now tell me again how it didn't function better?
