the student section seats arent any better at hilton
the problem is that we have a student body filled with kids that dont care and there is no tailgating to draw them in.
You sir, are an idiot. College students want to be respectful? LOL!!!
All good ideas. I agree with the notion of including some athletics charge in the student activity fee to cover the cost of attending major athletic event (mainly football and men's basketball) and then letting students get in free, but there may be an issue of requiring all students to pay for something that only a fraction of them benefit from. (This was an issue 35 years ago with a student activity fee subsidy of the Daily Iowan.)
CHA, unfortunately, was designed for fat-azz farmers/donors and not a vocal student body. It didn't need to be at the time it was built; years ago, believe it or not, a ticket to men's hoops at CHA was hard to get. I don't know whether a redesign would allow closing off aisles near the floor or putting in bleacher seating behind the benches and in view of the TV cameras for students. I'm not sure Barry Garta would even be interested in exploring that. But the fact is students are not packed in close to the floor; you get little sense from TV that there's even a student body attending other than shouts of "Byrd, you suck!" amid screeches of players' shoes on the hardwood and the occasional shot of the kid wearing the farmer outfit or the teletubbies.
Those would be huge steps forward. But the university also needs to be aggressive in encouraging that sort of effort through marketing, organization, tschotckes, meeting with coaches and players. People in the Hawks Nest need to feel like they are a part of something special, something that gives them a benefit that non-members don't get. Even if it's getting the chance to walk through a special Hawks Nest/boosters ticket entrance with a gold rug at CHA.
. . . it is because the current leadership of the Hawk's Nest puts priority on being weird . . . and it turns off many students who want to go and enjoy the event, but instead are asked to act foolishly in a mediocre circus performance.
One reason is people/students don't want to go if they're losing. We're just starting to become a fun/winning team again. We're still in transition, hence why attendance numbers have been on the rise lately. Teams that win get attendance. That loss to the powerhouse that is Nebby Basketball a week before didn't do much to raise confidence.
It's exactly like what T.J. said in the article. "Perfect Storm." I got off work at 6 on Wednesday, then had homework to take care of and a midterm on Friday to study for. I didn't really feel like walking my *** 15 minutes across campus to and from CHA in the cold just to watch Purdue.
CHA is not a good basketball arena. It would be nice if the Athletic Department looked into building a dedicated basketball/practice facility apart from CHA. Smaller, more intimate and much louder.
yeah ajk nailed it. rest of the arena was packed and the student section had it half filled. and that's a generous estimate. dirt cheap tickets and free pizza for a team on or around the bubble and that's the turnout. pretty sad. I ended up putting off buying tickets and wound up in the second to last row. still not a bad seat in the place.
CHA is not a good basketball arena. It would be nice if the Athletic Department looked into building a dedicated basketball/practice facility apart from CHA. Smaller, more intimate and much louder.
Fail. You must not be old enough to remember games there in the late 80's. Loud as hell and a ton of fun. It's the people in the arena that are the problem. As bad as Iowa basketball has been for some time it is going to take more than just a few decent wins and average seasons to clear out the blue hairs and bring the energy back. The foundation is there and things have improved a ton in the few short years since Fran has arrived and as long as they continue to keep winning and playing entertaining basketball ball they will come they most definitely will come.
CHA is not a good basketball arena.
The architectural design of Carver-Hawkeye Arena does, in my viewpoint, harm the basketball environment. While it certainly doesn't dissuade a raucous environment, it does very little to promote one. You complain about "blue hairs" keeping the energy away, but the best seats in the house, those closest to the court, are those most expensive, and thus more likely to be purchased and/or retained by wealthier fans with seniority. Carver-Hawkeye has fewer seats around the court in comparison to most facilities, based on it's unique ocular "giant pit" design, and since those seats are primarily occupied with low energy fans, the result is the area immediately around the court is less enthusiastic.