99topdawg
Well-Known Member
Iowa is -5.5 right now. I would never bet on an Iowa game.
They start a 6'5" guy and 4 6'6" guys. I like the fact that they don't have a big guy to try to slow down Garza. They'll have to help down low which should open up our shooters. With their line up and length, I worry about them pressuring the perimeter.
Oregon Iowa
PPG 74.4 83.8
FG% 47.2% 46.9
FT% 70.4 71.3
3pt%. 37.9 38.6
TO. 11.4 9.5
BLK 3.6 4.5
STL. 7.5 5.6
AST 13.4 19.1
Reb marg 1.0 2.8
3pt def% 33.6 34.5
Last 10. 8-2. 8-2
Lukas 0 1
Their athleticism worries me. They struggled a bit early in the season when they had 3 guys out with injury. The #1 stat that I took into account is that, in football and basketball combined, I am 1-114 in games I've picked ( I picked up to beat NC Central earlier this season to break the streak). Because of that, I pick the
Rubber Duckies 84 Hawks 82
They start a 6'5" guy and 4 6'6" guys. I like the fact that they don't have a big guy to try to slow down Garza. They'll have to help down low which should open up our shooters. With their line up and length, I worry about them pressuring the perimeter.
Oregon Iowa
PPG 74.4 83.8
FG% 47.2% 46.9
FT% 70.4 71.3
3pt%. 37.9 38.6
TO. 11.4 9.5
BLK 3.6 4.5
STL. 7.5 5.6
AST 13.4 19.1
Reb marg 1.0 2.8
3pt def% 33.6 34.5
Last 10. 8-2. 8-2
Lukas 0 1
Their athleticism worries me. They struggled a bit early in the season when they had 3 guys out with injury. The #1 stat that I took into account is that, in football and basketball combined, I am 1-114 in games I've picked ( I picked up to beat NC Central earlier this season to break the streak). Because of that, I pick the
Rubber Duckies 84 Hawks 82