Gamefilm

deanvogs said:
You try to twist and turn everything. Miller knows his credentials, and checked them out before letting in write for this site. If Gamefilm wasn't what he said he was, Miller wouldn't have let him on the site. That is what I am saying, like it or not Gamefilm is legit, or he wouldn't have ever been about to write for the site.

You still have yet to post your "credentials". I'm guessing you coached HS football in the state here, but that is about it. There are literally thousands of HS football coaches in the state.
Click to expand...
No, YOU are liberal with facts. I answer to directly what you say. You 'assume' facts not in evidence on a regular basis. So, answering 'directly' to what you said....Gamefilm is never wrong because of his credentials (and he even admitted to me he was wrong) and Gamefilm would never express bias. His assessment of someone or something is 'law' becasue Miller knows his credentials....Got it! Listen, he's just expressing his 'opinion' and even though it is a more 'informed' opinion than most, he is still not always right. I'm not always right, and never have claimed to be....
 
Ickehawk said:
You think 'founders' of internet chat rooms are football experts? Lol. They're reporters, they didn't play football, they studied journalism and were in the French club (not that there's anything wrong with that). Ask guys like Mike Hlas (etc.) how many sports he played, etc...These guys (internet 'fan' sites) had to literally 'fight' to even get media crendentials at Iowa... I'm sure he probably won't know who I am or care, just like I don't know who he is or 'care'...I'm sure there are 10's of thousands of 'football' people all over the midwest (and Colorado) that he doesn't know...I don't need JO Miller to 'vouch' for me, lol............like that 'means' something
Click to expand...

So you're just another fan with opinions. Got it.

And despite your superior knowledge and supreme desire to never be wrong or disagreed with, you devolve almost every thread your in, just like every other troll.

You probably need to have your privilege of spouting your "opinions" here revoked. That won't be a big deal though, cause it's just a source of entertainment for you, right?
 
HawkeyeWalker said:
I'd be curious as to who Gamefilm is, but it doesn't really matter. Conversely, I couldn't care less who you are. You both seem to know x's and o's more than your average fan, but Gamefilm isn't an a$$ about it.
Click to expand...
No one on here ever disagrees with him, as they think he's knowledgeable (some internet anonymous guru) and can't talk 'his' language'. He's an ass if you question or disagree with him on something, as he showed when I disagreed with him. I'm like the only one who would disagree with him, because I can prove him wrong....
 
HawkeyeWalker said:
So you're just another fan with opinions. Got it.

And despite your superior knowledge and supreme desire to never be wrong or disagreed with, you devolve almost every thread your in, just like every other troll.

You probably need to have your privilege of spouting your "opinions" here revoked. That won't be a big deal though, cause it's just a source of entertainment for you, right?
Click to expand...
It's not entertainment for you? What is it then? Your only source of social activity? How does my pointing out that some don't have a clue what they are talking about make me a troll? Interesting concept...I should have my privilage to express my opinion revoked? Spoken like a true 'modern' murican. No ones forcing you to read my 'opinions', now are they......
 
Ickehawk said:
No one on here ever disagrees with him, as they think he's knowledgeable (some internet anonymous guru) and can't talk 'his' language'. He's an ass if you question or disagree with him on something, as he showed when I disagreed with him. I'm like the only one who would disagree with him, because I can prove him wrong....
Click to expand...

Meh. All I know is he's contributed to this site with good insight and everyone respects his opinion. The fact he may not be always 100% correct is irrelevant. He, nor the other posters on here need your constant self righteous desire to be the most knowledgeable fan.

Get over it or don't and eventually go away.
 
Ickehawk said:
It's not entertainment for you? What is it then? Your only source of social activity? How does my pointing out that some don't have a clue what they are talking about make me a troll? Interesting concept...I should have my privilage to express my opinion revoked? Spoken like a true 'modern' murican. No ones forcing you to read my 'opinions', now are they......
Click to expand...

Passive aggressive troll, my bad.
 
That person also didn't like being called a dude. Sure he is a he and not female? I couldn't tell what was meant.[/QUOTE]

My bad, I fixed my post. Although I belive they are a he.
 
Hey Gamefilm, watch the very first play Iowa St. runs. Jewell get's 'over the top' but doesn't 'line the runner up' and lets him spin off for a 2 1/2 yd. gain. According to you, that is horrible LB play....or at least it was when Bower did it.
 
Ickehawk said:
Hey Gamefilm, watch the very first play Iowa St. runs. Jewell get's 'over the top' but doesn't 'line the runner up' and lets him spin off for a 2 1/2 yd. gain. According to you, that is horrible LB play....or at least it was when Bower did it.
Click to expand...

Do you think The Outlaw is happy giving up an extra 2 1/2 yards? Just curious.
 
deanvogs said:
Do you think The Outlaw is happy giving up an extra 2 1/2 yards? Just curious.
Click to expand...
What kind of ignorant statement is that? And what does that have to do with anything? Do you think Bower was 'happy' about it. And you and Gamefilm watch the 4th and 1 play with 20 seconds left in the half where Jewell doesn't 'line up' (as Gamefilm likes to call it) the back and the back runs through his tackle for 3 yds and a 1st down. It looked almost identical to the short TD run that he (Gamefilm) criticized Bower on the week before. I didn't see where Gamefilm was talking about the 'poor' linebacking play of Jewell in this game. Gamefilm is a tool, sorry. And it wasn't 'poor' linebacking by either LB in either game. Our LB play (outside of Hockaday getting thrown to the wolves) has been pretty damn good and Bower has played really well. The only thing I can really gig him on in this game was his slow read of the screen to Lazard and not playing the cut block well.........
 
Ickehawk said:
What kind of ignorant statement is that? And what does that have to do with anything? Do you think Bower was 'happy' about it. And you and Gamefilm watch the 4th and 1 play with 20 seconds left in the half where Jewell doesn't 'line up' (as Gamefilm likes to call it) the back and the back runs through his tackle for 3 yds and a 1st down. It looked almost identical to the short TD run that he (Gamefilm) criticized Bower on the week before. I didn't see where Gamefilm was talking about the 'poor' linebacking play of Jewell in this game. Gamefilm is a tool, sorry. And it wasn't 'poor' linebacking by either LB in either game. Our LB play (outside of Hockaday getting thrown to the wolves) has been pretty damn good and Bower has played really well. The only thing I can really gig him on in this game was his slow read of the screen to Lazard and not playing the cut block well.........
Click to expand...

Oh look it's Icke trying to steal attention again. You need some new material. Getting mighty boring.

giphy.gif
 
kicker22 said:
Is anyone else starting to think this thread may go all season. It's unreal.
Click to expand...

Icke will argue with anyone. That's his gig. I'm sure this will go on all season if we keep feeding him. I think we all realize he's a pompous tool. So let's just all agree to either point and laugh or ignore his BS. There's no need to feed the troll by giving him what he wants.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Share this page

Top