I don't think there's any intentional deception.
Here's the excerpt from my story:
The coach was asked Saturday if Fredrick, who missed the Syracuse game earlier this season with a quad injury, was out with a bum ankle.
“Yeah, I think ankle, foot, something down there,” Fran McCaffery said then.
The coach said Monday that Fredrick did not sprain his ankle.
“It’s something else,” said Fran McCaffery, who did not elaborate on the ailment.
Asked Monday if Fredick’s injury could keep him out for more than the Nebraska game, the coach wasn’t sure.
He said he would know more in the next day or so.
“I’m not ducking the question. We’re just looking at a variety of things on him. We want to make sure before we run him back out there that he’s ready to go. He clearly was not ready to go in the second half (against Penn State),” Fran McCaffery said.
“A lot of times your trainer will say, well, he could probably go, we won’t make it any worse. But when your trainer says he can’t go then you shut him down. That’s kind of how it was and that’s kind of how it is right now. So, until I hear otherwise, that’s how it is.”
----------------
Fran never confirmed it was the ankle back on Saturday. There were assumptions it was the ankle. I think that's what the sideline reporter said on the TV broadcast, which I'm guessing she got from Iowa. That's why I asked directly Monday if it was an ankle sprain and he said it was not. I don't think they knew exactly what it was on Saturday.
I still don't think they knew on Monday exactly what is injured.
Fran said: "We’re just looking at a variety of things on him."
The stranger part for me was if he was hurt before or during the Penn State game. That remains unclear, not that it matters now.