Have to agree to disagree for two reasons. I can only compare to the current BCS travesty, but I think it's a fair comparison on how *not* to do things.
#1--Selection committee uses far more objective criteria than the BCS could ever hope for. RPI, SoS, real data. No homer voters. No apathetic voters. No idiotic computer. No reward for playing an easy non-conf schedule (just the opposite). Rather, a group of people who take what they do seriously.
#2--BCS way of things harshly penalizes a team for losing late...the lack of sex appeal, etc. At least the BB committee rewards a team for the entire body of work, rather than 'what have you done for me lately.' That is why both Minney and Illinois still get serious dance consideration, as they should.
Perfect? Far from it. Infinitely better than the BCS charade? Undeniable.