In a laughable blog, he states there is clearly a conspiracy in the Big Ten regarding the officials. Ha ha.
http://www.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/5881996/18004276
http://www.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/5881996/18004276
He's just a bandwagoner since SEC officiating has taken a hit.
Besides, the booth was more questionable than the field refs. They did ok other than missing a few tackles of the IU OL on Iowa's DL.
Seems to me like that's more of a voting conspiracy.
Since when has watching the games been a requirement of voting?""If you're a Top 25 voter and you don't vote Iowa down -- as in, worse than last week -- after this game, then you didn't watch the game. Or you didn't know what you were watching.""
Seems to me like that's more of a voting conspiracy.
Since when has watching the games been a requirement of voting?
""If you're a Top 25 voter and you don't vote Iowa down -- as in, worse than last week -- after this game, then you didn't watch the game. Or you didn't know what you were watching.""
Seems to me like that's more of a voting conspiracy.
+1 He wants to talk about officiating conspiracies, just where is he voting Florida?Touche
But really, its not going to matter. Iowa has to win out, and they need Texas to lose, if they are going to play for it all.
Perhaps, but he has made a name for himself by making statements of absolutes and being controversial.
It's not, which is why Iowa probly goes up in the human polls and drops in computers this week
It's not, which is why Iowa probly goes up in the human polls and drops in computers this week