None of the pundits disagree with OSU being in the Top 4 despite having no better quality wins than Iowa...they simply justify it by stating that they cannot ignore the obvious talent on the squad, and the fact that they've under performed all season. They admit using the "eyeball test" to quickly raise other teams....so, why can they not use the "eyeball test" for at least the time being to justify keeping OSU out of the Top 4? Just because you are known to have talent doesn't make you elite every season.....look at ASU who some had in the Final 4 sitting at 5-5 with more talent than 90% of the teams in the country. I guarantee that if any of the current Top 4 happen to stumble, we will hear talk about how unfair it is to still have the likes of Iowa in the mix, and how we really need 8 teams in to be fair.
Last edited: