Does the BIG 10 Network ever talk about the Hawks?!?

[Unknownbadger]

<<Revsine and Pizzo know les about the game than most of us, and Hall is a clown that knows even less>>

Revsine and Pizzo have FORGOTTEN more about the game than you'll ever know. And that is NOT a knock on you. But they know their stuff, and they've both been doing it for a while. Hall is a "broadcast personality", and has never touted himself as a football expert, nor has the network.

If that is what you think then I'm not sure how much you know about the game. Sorry.

 

[hawkeyebob62]

If that is what you think then I'm not sure how much you know about the game. Sorry.

I know a ton, don't know just as much. And I don't presume to know more than people who view it/analyze it/talk about it for a living. Folow Revsine and Pizzo on Twitter and you will get a pretty good idea how foolish you look making statements like that. Or maybe not...

 

[SteveGarvey1]

Why do I even waste my time watching them? and I have watched them a lot over the past two weeks and it seems like they hardly plug Iowa. Also, Stanley Jackson just said Northwestern will win the West this year.

Stanley Jackson is just voicing an opinion which he's paid to do. I've got no problem with that. I'd rather nobody picks Iowa myself actually.

 

[Unknownbadger]

I know a ton, don't know just as much. And I don't presume to know more than people who view it/analyze it/talk about it for a living. Folow Revsine and Pizzo on Twitter and you will get a pretty good idea how foolish you look making statements like that. Or maybe not...

You have no idea what my background is. None. I doubt Revsine or Pizzo have ever played the game. They are talking heads that read a script. No more than that.

 

[MelroseHawkins]

I really like Revsine. I think he's pretty objective. Not sure if it's on paper or in his head but he pulls it off. I could do without Pizzo as he does nothing for me. Really could do without Reality Winner Hall as he borders on annoying to me.

 

[MelroseHawkins]

They show the Hawks all the time. Do you ever notice that whenever they are covering another team and showing highlights of good plays by the other team that the team they are covering is always playing Iowa.

 

[okeefe4prez]

They show the Hawks all the time. Do you ever notice that whenever they are covering another team and showing highlights of good plays by the other team that the team they are covering is always playing Iowa.

Rutgers gets some coverage that way, too.

 

[hawkeyebob62]

You have no idea what my background is. None. I doubt Revsine or Pizzo have ever played the game. They are talking heads that read a script. No more than that.

I've read your posts. They speak volumes.

 

[dahlhawk]

They show a lot of segments on Iowa, probable more than we deserve, Plus you see a lot of ex-hawks as commentators such as Long and Settles.

 

[Sooby]

Come on folks.
BTN always has time to remind of that great win in 2007 vs Michigan State.
(An Iowa team that finished 6-6 and a Michigan State team that finished 7-6).

TV is about ratings, and, thankfully, Iowa gets an equal portion of the pie.

 

[Unknownbadger]

They show a lot of segments on Iowa, probable more than we deserve, Plus you see a lot of ex-hawks as commentators such as Long and Settles.

As yours show little.

I've read your posts. They speak volumes.

As yours show so much less.

 

[hawkeyebob62]

As yours show little.

As yours show so much less.

LTG

 

[hawkeyebob62]

You have no idea what my background is. None. I doubt Revsine or Pizzo have ever played the game. They are talking heads that read a script. No more than that.

Actually, I have a pretty good idea what your background is. And it's prolly not good. Just sayin'

 

[IndianaHawk]

As yours show little.

As yours show so much less.

Then why don't you work for B1G network?

 

[hawkeyebob62]

Then why don't you work for B1G network?

Learn The Background!

But I quite agree. This board is already overloaded with coaches. We don't need more media "experts".