Does Kirk really value ball security?

Healzya

Well-Known Member
I went to look at some Big Ten QB numbers from last year. I constantly hear the Iowa staff harp on ball security and wanted to check for myself. I pulled all the QB stats for anyone with over 100 attempts. Padilla was far better than Petras in the ball security department. Petras even got the much easier schedule at the beginning of the season. Neither of these guys are good but I really don't think they can use ball security as an excuse anymore.

PlayerTeamAttCmpPctYdsTDIntInt%SackLossRateInt/Att.
Jack PlummerPUR
127​
87​
68.5​
864​
7​
0​
0​
9​
53​
143.8​
127.00​
Artur SitkowskiILL
148​
74​
50​
704​
6​
2​
1.4​
8​
48​
100.6​
74.00​
C.J. StroudOSU
441​
317​
71.9​
4,435​
44​
6​
1.4​
13​
103​
186.6​
73.50​
Alex PadillaIOWA
112​
55​
49.1​
636​
2​
2​
1.8​
7​
39​
99.1​
56.00​
Cade McNamaraMICH
327​
210​
64.2​
2,576​
15​
6​
1.8​
11​
81​
141.9​
54.50​
Sean CliffordPSU
428​
261​
61​
3,107​
21​
8​
1.9​
30​
189​
134.4​
53.50​
Ryan HilinskiNW
176​
95​
54​
978​
3​
4​
2.3​
9​
74​
101.7​
44.00​
Noah VedralRUTG
304​
181​
59.5​
1,824​
7​
7​
2.3​
19​
108​
112.9​
43.43​
Taulia TagovailoaUMD
474​
328​
69.2​
3,860​
26​
11​
2.3​
25​
234​
151.1​
43.09​
Brandon PetersILL
170​
91​
53.5​
1,170​
7​
4​
2.4​
15​
121​
120.2​
42.50​
Aidan O'ConnellPUR
440​
315​
71.6​
3,711​
28​
11​
2.5​
18​
144​
158.4​
40.00​
Payton ThorneMSU
390​
235​
60.3​
3,240​
27​
10​
2.6​
21​
151​
147.8​
39.00​
Spencer PetrasIOWA
288​
165​
57.3​
1,880​
10​
9​
3.1​
24​
168​
117.3​
32.00​
Adrian MartinezNEB
306​
189​
61.8​
2,863​
14​
10​
3.3​
27​
154​
148.9​
30.60​
Tanner MorganMINN
250​
149​
59.6​
2,044​
10​
9​
3.6​
22​
168​
134.3​
27.78​
Graham MertzWIS
284​
169​
59.5​
1,958​
10​
11​
3.9​
13​
108​
121.3​
25.82​
Michael Penix Jr.IND
162​
87​
53.7​
939​
4​
7​
4.3​
8​
54​
101.9​
23.14​
Andrew MartyNW
110​
66​
60​
707​
6​
6​
5.5​
13​
97​
121.1​
18.33​
 
It's almost like Kirk believes that the key to winning the game is to make no mistakes whatsoever. If you try anything on offense it could result in something bad, so it's best not to try anything. Let the other team make the mistakes and Iowa will win.
 
Small sample size, but also of note, Padilla has the lowest completion percentage. The folks with low total attempts are clustered at the bottom and top of this list, so I suspect this stat for the folks with few attempts is more variance than anything else. Troubling that Petras is that close to Martinez, lol.
 
images


Kirk Ferentz:

"If I throw the ball down the field, we may get a big gain or score a touchdown. On the other hand, the ball might get dropped, picked off, or we take no time off the clock. I could send a makeable, manageable pass that gets a first down. Then again, having Petras throw a 3 yard pass has a higher percentage of a completion and 3 yards is better than nothing, even if it does not result in a first down because we have a great punter. However, passing the ball is much more of a risk than just handing the ball off....the ball has to travel from hand to hand and a much shorter distance. Oh, man what should I do.........uh...uh....uh.........send in the stretch play to the short side of the field."

Petras:
"Stretch Play on a snap count 4."

Iowa Receiver A thinking to himself:
"F, why do we even play here....all we do is wind-sprints and when the ball is thrown our way we have to jump 20 feet into the air to even have a chance at the ball."

Iowa Receiver B thinking to himself:
"I saw Charlie the other night make a bunch of catches....Purdue is kind of close in our color scheme."

Head Official:
Delay of Game....5 yard penalty...repeat 3rd down.

Kirk Ferentz:
"At least we have more room to punt if we don't pick this up. Well, we didn't pick it up....l should probably write something down....no wait....what a beautiful punt. Punting really is winning."

Iowa Defense and Phil Parker:

"Time to bail out the fucking offense yet again."


Rinse and Repeat.

1662605144381.png
 
Last edited:
images


Kirk Ferentz:

"If I throw the ball down the field, we may get a big gain or score a touchdown. On the other hand, the ball might get dropped, picked off, or we take no time off the clock. I could send a makeable, manageable pass that gets a first down. Then again, having Petras throw a 3 yard pass has a higher percentage of a completion and 3 yards is better than nothing, even if it does not result in a first down because we have a great punter. However, passing the ball is much more of a risk than just handing the ball off....the ball has to travel from hand to hand and a much shorter distance. Oh, man what should I do.........uh...uh....uh.........send in the stretch play to the short side of the field."

Petras:
"Stretch Play on a snap count 4."

Iowa Receiver A thinking to himself:
"F, why do we even play here....all we do is wind-sprints and when the ball is thrown our way we have to jump 20 feet into the air to even have a chance at the ball."

Iowa Receiver B thinking to himself:
"I saw Charlie the other night make a bunch of catches....Purdue is kind of close in our color scheme."

Head Official:
Delay of Game....5 yard penalty...repeat 3rd down.

Kirk Ferentz:
"At least we have more room to punt if we don't pick this up. Well, we didn't pick it up....l should probably write something down....no wait....what a beautiful punt. Punting really is winning."

Iowa Defense and Phil Parker:

"Time to bail out the fucking offense yet again."


Rinse and Repeat.

View attachment 9246
This is Gold!
 
That offensive plan on Saturday was the equivalent of a basketball team letting the shot clock expire on almost every possession. They knew-

They wouldn't need any more points
They had a hot punter
The only way they were going to lose was to give the Jackrabbits a short field.

They didn't even seem to concerned about the lost fumble near the goal line. To them that probably felt like another vintage Taylor punt.
 
That offensive plan on Saturday was the equivalent of a basketball team letting the shot clock expire on almost every possession. They knew-

They wouldn't need any more points
They had a hot punter
The only way they were going to lose was to give the Jackrabbits a short field.

They didn't even seem to concerned about the lost fumble near the goal line. To them that probably felt like another vintage Taylor punt.
I have been thinking about this more and more as the week goes on. They ran the same plays over and over. I mean they don't have a lot of plays to begin with but last Saturday seemed even worse. Rewatching the game there was almost no chance that South Dakota State was going to score without some fluke play like a turnover or broken coverage. It might be me just grasping at straws but I am hoping that's the case and this Saturday they will actually open it up.

None of that explains the O-line and QB play being abysmal though.
 
I have been thinking about this more and more as the week goes on. They ran the same plays over and over. I mean they don't have a lot of plays to begin with but last Saturday seemed even worse. Rewatching the game there was almost no chance that South Dakota State was going to score without some fluke play like a turnover or broken coverage. It might be me just grasping at straws but I am hoping that's the case and this Saturday they will actually open it up.

None of that explains the O-line and QB play being abysmal though.
Who thought KY was going to score again last season?
 
I always have great confidence in the D, until the other team needs to score at the end of the game.

Well, when Iowa's offense doesn't sustain long drives all game, the D has a tendency to get a bit tired in the 4th Q. That is a reason for a ball control offense and to win the TOP.
 
Does he value ball security? Can you really consider giving the other team the ball every 4 plays ball security? He's starting a guy with 8 interceptions to 1 TD over the last however many games. I think in his mind he does, but in reality he does not. Not when it means making hard decisions on Brian. As another poster says, he fears risk, not the turnovers themselves

This isn't something I've looked up, but turnovers are really about field position, momentum and giving extra opportunities to the other team's offense. With the constant 3 and outs, I wonder how many opportunities Iowa's opponents have on average vs other teams that commit more turnovers.

Does that make any sense?
 
Petras has had a fumble and interception in each of the two games to start the year.
Hardly ball security.
Typically, Kirk would have pulled any other player and given them some bench time, possibly for the whole game (Think IKM).
Why do his standards not apply to Petras?
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Top