TheBattman
Well-Known Member
I would probably go with Mario Manningham as a comparison over Breaston. Manningham was more of WR than Breaston was a Michigan when he was their deep threat.
Again, that's apples and oranges, as CAAR said. Breaston was never the #1 guy because of the players around him. DJK has been our #1 for going on 4 years. He wouldn't have been the #1 at Michigan with Edwards, Avant, and Manningham there (not to mention Arrington).
The ypc numbers have quite a bit to do with how the two were used. Breaston was very fast, but he was a slot receiver. Edwards and Manningham were the deep threats. DJK plays the deep threat role for us, hence the higher ypc numbers. Breaston did most of his damage on underneath routes, because they didn't need him to be the deep threat.
Wow. A fellow traveler. I could care less about the NFL.I dont follow the NFL much. Mostly just former Iowa players.
remember when DJK had 3 td's saturday!?
its too bad you can't do celebrations in college football...i bet DJK could come up with something AWESOME
This argument is ridiculous. DJK didn't become a regular starter until THIS SEASON. Dude has been riding the pine when he is let out of his doghouse.
.....and yet he has led Iowa in receiving 3 straight years, soon to be 4. DJK hasn't been the #1 guy either.
Jon: I said it was my perception and used the word "seem" to indicate perception. If I meant Breaston WAS faster, I would say he WAS faster. My point was that your OP made me reconsider my perception. Surprised you didn't get that, because that is what I said.
But nice ironic use of a quote.
I think people are getting their Michigan receiving units mixed up. It was Edwards, Avant, and Breaston. Then Manningham and Arrington. Breaston did have one year with the Arrington/Manningham unit, but he was hurt for a lot of it.
I haven't checked times, but my recollection is Manningham was not a burner.
I think people are getting their Michigan receiving units mixed up. It was Edwards, Avant, and Breaston. Then Manningham and Arrington. Breaston did have one year with the Arrington/Manningham unit, but he was hurt for a lot of it.
I haven't checked times, but my recollection is Manningham was not a burner.
I think people are getting their Michigan receiving units mixed up. It was Edwards, Avant, and Breaston. Then Manningham and Arrington. Breaston did have one year with the Arrington/Manningham unit, but he was hurt for a lot of it.
I haven't checked times, but my recollection is Manningham was not a burner.
Manningham also had some issues with smoking the green stuff, if I'm not mistaken.