Did Anyone Notice KF Run After a Ref?

StickUP

Well-Known Member
At the end of the game, KF ran quickly up to the ref who spots the ball and says something to him. If was even more noticeable because of how quickly he sprinted across the field at the end of the game. You don't see that very often.
 
That was the angriest I've seen Ferrets in a long, long time. Too bad he doesn't chew out his quarterback, defensive ends and offensive coordinator like that every time they screw up. Maybe if he did the win-loss record would be better.
 
My wife and I noticed the sprint across the field as soon as the final snap was over. Met Anderson 2/3 of the way across the field, quickly shook his hand, then sprinted towards the locker room. I missed him talking to the ref. He was ******.
 
Why did the ref take his gum? What an absolutely pathetic display of coaching in the first half. Time for Ferentz to find a new job.
 
My wife and I noticed the sprint across the field as soon as the final snap was over. Met Anderson 2/3 of the way across the field, quickly shook his hand, then sprinted towards the locker room. I missed him talking to the ref. He was ******.


no doubt he took off so quickly to hand shake - his purpose was to get a last 'shot' at that ref - he said something in passing - i did see that too - maybe it was a 'have a happy thanksgiving', but i doubt it.
 
The refs sucked a big one and I hope Barta and KF send a nice video of the plays they are ****** off about.

It wont changed anything now but maybe in the future.
 
Wisconsin sure gets away with a lot of holding out on the edge. King’s jersey is gonna need some serious patching.
 
That was the angriest I've seen Ferrets in a long, long time. Too bad he doesn't chew out his quarterback, defensive ends and offensive coordinator like that every time they screw up. Maybe if he did the win-loss record would be better.

Yes, it works for pelini. Just sayin.
 
At the end of the game, KF ran quickly up to the ref who spots the ball and says something to him. If was even more noticeable because of how quickly he sprinted across the field at the end of the game. You don't see that very often.

Yes I did.. he had something to say to him.
 
I saw him call that ref a F_____ A_____ on tv.




2lsw21s.jpg
 
It seemed as if the refs were trying all they could to help Wisconsin. They play stoppage and missed holding calls were complete garbage. This was 1985 first half vs Michigan bad ref job. I would be upset too.
 
Wisky looked like jNW with all the offensive holding. Teams know the refs wont call every holding so they just do it.

The hawks got away with a couple things but not nearly as much as wisky.
 
I hate the style of holding that teams like Wiscy & OSU are doing these days. It's obviously coached, where after the play has passed the OL turns the D player back towards the play and gives him a push in the back to get him going, like that makes it less noticeable.
 
I'm guessing he was still ****** off about that second 2-point conversion attempt. During the first attempt, he had to run halfway out on the field to tell the refs which hash he wanted the ball placed on. He had to do the same thing on the second attempt except they charged Iowa with a timeout....which KF did not call. He blew up because that only left us with 1 timeout for the rest of the game, and he didn't call it in the first place.

IMO, the replay has had a very negative effect on the quality of officiating on the field. These officials know that if they get it wrong that replay will bail them out and get it right. I think it's complete laziness. I would argue that officials today are less knowledgeable than they were before replay.
 
Can someone answer this for me? When Wisky was called for the running into the kicker penalty, they decided to review the call. Were they reviewing it in order to decide whether to call him for roughing or were the actually reviewing whether it was a penalty (or both)? I guess I didn't think you could review penalties. I was at the game so I didn't hear what was being discussed at the time.
 
Can someone answer this for me? When Wisky was called for the running into the kicker penalty, they decided to review the call. Were they reviewing it in order to decide whether to call him for roughing or were the actually reviewing whether it was a penalty (or both)? I guess I didn't think you could review penalties. I was at the game so I didn't hear what was being discussed at the time.


They thought the ball was tipped, and if so, no penalty...
 
Can someone answer this for me? When Wisky was called for the running into the kicker penalty, they decided to review the call. Were they reviewing it in order to decide whether to call him for roughing or were the actually reviewing whether it was a penalty (or both)? I guess I didn't think you could review penalties. I was at the game so I didn't hear what was being discussed at the time.


I was at the game. When replay began looking at the roughing the kicker penalty we were really surprised. I sit with a bunch of people who have been around football since it was invented, and no one had heard of replay reviewing a penalty. I was also listening to the radio broadcast and Dolph and Ed said the same thing...they didn't know a penalty was reviewable.

I don't know if it is reviewable or not, but in this situation they reviewed it anyway.

Only targeting is reviewable, but that is to determine if it the player should be ejected from the game. That is an automatic review.
 

Latest posts

Top