nationalchamps
Well-Known Member
Amazing how most people on here the past few years have ****** and moaned to throw the ball more and then when we do........
Amazing how most people on here the past few years have ****** and moaned to throw the ball more and then when we do........
I highly disagree with the OP's premise. KF may have wanted the right side of the line to do a lot of blocking for reps but they knew it was not going to be a scrimmage against last years MAC champions.
We try to believe this every year to excuse poor scoring offense against weak/bad OOC competition...then about 6 weeks in, we realize that this is our offense.
I swear this happens every single year at Iowa.
Here's how I see it: I think Ferentz thought our defense was good enough that we could beat Ball State without using our offensive A game. So the passing attack was intentionally emphasized instead of the running game against Ball State because the staff wanted to work on it more. I think they believe the running game will be there when they need it, so they used this game to improve the passing attack. Let's face it, we and everyone knows we can run the ball. But we haven't had a good passing attack since Stanzi left. In year 3 of Greg Davis, we finally have an experienced QB and some talent at receiver. So to get the program to the next level, they're trying to develop what they hope is an actual passing threat. Hence the 55 pass attempts in a game that we were not playing from behind in until the 4th quarter. The defense was in fact good enough, but Kirk nearly got his tit caught in a ringer because 2 fumbles led to 10 Ball State points.
I predict we revert back to our normal predictable selves and run the ball down the Clones' throats next week. Hopefully the attention we gave to developing the passing game will pay dividends later in the season when we will need it to beat teams that can stop the run.
Geez, that one took a lot longer than I expected. It's so myopically incorrect and out of context that it's just too much work to address. Anyone else want to take a shot?
We played Bowling Green? I thought we played Ball State? No wonder we struggled, I am sure the coaches were preparing for Ball State since they were on our schedule.
I highly disagree with the OP's premise. KF may have wanted the right side of the line to do a lot of blocking for reps but they knew it was not going to be a scrimmage against last years MAC champions.
Vanilla offense is what we've seen during every game since KF became HC.
KF wants to establish the bread and butter consistency of our offense before he opens the play book up and he's always done that in the OOC part of our schedule.
Really? I thought he went deep more in the 4th qtr. Throwing 55 - 3 yard passes does not equal a wide open offense, IMO. But maybe that's what Davis brings to the table. We'll have to wait and see, I guess.Except that, ummmmmmm...we didn't even TRY to do that. Did you even watch the game? Serious question. We ran the same offense in the 4th quarter that we ran the entire game (55 pass attempts? Gotta be a KF-era record) it's just that Rudock didn't suck as bad during the last 5 minutes.
I find it very odd that the Hawks could not open up some running lanes, yet gave Rudock superior pass protection for nearly the whole game.
Usually linemen struggle with pass protect vs power blocking, not vice versa??
Really? I thought he went deep more in the 4th qtr. Throwing 55 - 3 yard passes does not equal a wide open offense, IMO. But maybe that's what Davis brings to the table. We'll have to wait and see, I guess.
I agree with this except I believe KF let Davis run his pass offense so he could virtually prove it really isn't going to work and all will be normal this week. You will see a heavy dose of the run game just like you said. The chess match has ended!