koralakers
Well-Known Member
Between 2 trophy games. Not too mention following emotional win. Add in revenge game (63-0). Lovie has these guys ballin. They seem so much more athletic this year too. Very worried about this game.
Speaking of trap, did anyone listen to Miller and Deace? I do like Deace's take on stuff, but man he thinks he is so objective when it comes to Michigan, but he isn't at all. He says this is a classic trap game because Iowa played Minnesota, then they go to Nebraska in 2 weeks, and Illinois is a total trap. Then he is talking about Michigan and they played MSU and in 2 weeks play OSU, but Indiana ISN'T a trap game because well ya know Michigan will "take them seriously". LOL.
BTW, I don't think this is gonna be a problem for Iowa. Illinois is living off turnovers. Illinois beat Wisconsin, MSU and Purdue and were +2 in TO in each of those games. They beat Rutgers and were +3 in TO. They were +3 in TO and couldn't beat Nebraska, they were +1 in TO vs Minnesota and got blown out. They were +0 in TO vs Michigan and got blown out. They were -1 in TO vs EMC and got beat.
If Iowa doesn't turn it over, they win easily.
That is a classic trap game for Michigan if ever there was one. top They will get thumped if they're not ready to go. On top of that, Michigan has to travel and we don't. Deace is either pulling our leg or he is trolling.Speaking of trap, did anyone listen to Miller and Deace? I do like Deace's take on stuff, but man he thinks he is so objective when it comes to Michigan, but he isn't at all. He says this is a classic trap game because Iowa played Minnesota, then they go to Nebraska in 2 weeks, and Illinois is a total trap. Then he is talking about Michigan and they played MSU and in 2 weeks play OSU, but Indiana ISN'T a trap game because well ya know Michigan will "take them seriously". LOL.
BTW, I don't think this is gonna be a problem for Iowa. Illinois is living off turnovers. Illinois beat Wisconsin, MSU and Purdue and were +2 in TO in each of those games. They beat Rutgers and were +3 in TO. They were +3 in TO and couldn't beat Nebraska, they were +1 in TO vs Minnesota and got blown out. They were +0 in TO vs Michigan and got blown out. They were -1 in TO vs EMC and got beat.
If Iowa doesn't turn it over, they win easily.
I do too but I want to do it coming off a win against IL and having looked good doing it. I don't want to give Neb any real hope they could put up a fight against us going in.Meh.
The only thing I care about is Nebraska.
Can’t lose to those inbred mongoloids. We’re going to a no name bowl whether we win two or lose two and we’ve been out of the division contention for a long time.
Stick a fork in those genetic defects or just stay in Lincoln till next year.
Meh.
The only thing I care about is Nebraska.
Can’t lose to those inbred mongoloids. We’re going to a no name bowl whether we win two or lose two and we’ve been out of the division contention for a long time.
Stick a fork in those genetic defects or just stay in Lincoln till next year.
You mean like when we opened up our offense and hammered Ohio state in 2017 only to revert back to sugarless vanilla the next two weeks and get smoked by Wisconsin and then came home to get beat by Purdue???
Shoot, if avoiding turnovers at all costs is the plan, (high probability) fans will be treated to lots of Iowa punting, running backs gaining 3.0 PC, and pass attempts 7 yards or less. 6-2 win? Fielding a kick with the hopes of a return? LOLSpeaking of trap, did anyone listen to Miller and Deace? I do like Deace's take on stuff, but man he thinks he is so objective when it comes to Michigan, but he isn't at all. He says this is a classic trap game because Iowa played Minnesota, then they go to Nebraska in 2 weeks, and Illinois is a total trap. Then he is talking about Michigan and they played MSU and in 2 weeks play OSU, but Indiana ISN'T a trap game because well ya know Michigan will "take them seriously". LOL.
BTW, I don't think this is gonna be a problem for Iowa. Illinois is living off turnovers. Illinois beat Wisconsin, MSU and Purdue and were +2 in TO in each of those games. They beat Rutgers and were +3 in TO. They were +3 in TO and couldn't beat Nebraska, they were +1 in TO vs Minnesota and got blown out. They were +0 in TO vs Michigan and got blown out. They were -1 in TO vs EMC and got beat.
If Iowa doesn't turn it over, they win easily.
Shoot, if avoiding turnovers at all costs is the plan, (high probability) fans will be treated to lots of Iowa punting, running backs gaining 3.0 PC, and pass attempts 7 yards or less. 6-2 win? Fielding a kick with the hopes of a return? LOL
Iowa has a lot of pieces in place now that weren't there a few weeks ago. Goodson; Welch; Brandon Smith; etc. etc.
I think we score 35 points and outscore them in an exciting game.
14-3 would be very nice in my book. Don't work off of assumptions.And if Iowa wins 14-3 I will be happy, and you will still be grinding your axe. Que Sera Sera