WestCoastHawk
Well-Known Member
Watch ISU, Duke, Indiana, Kentucky home games and then watch Iowa's and tell me that it isn't a morgue. The home court atmosphere is a joke and needs to be changed.
Watch ISU, Duke, Indiana, Kentucky home games and then watch Iowa's and tell me that it isn't a morgue. The home court atmosphere is a joke and needs to be changed.
Quite a difference between the crowds with Lute to Mr. Davis vs now.
Really need to move the student section to the court - like everyone else.
Carver is a freaking morgue
1- I agree that Carver is a joke, one of these worst home court advantages in college basketball. I have been saying that for 10 years now.
2- Students are a big part of the problem. What a joke! Do they even care at all? What a bunch of pansies.
Not a great game in some ways with 47 fouls
ThisFor ****'s sake.
1. Where is this myth that "everyone else" puts the students courtside coming from? Indiana doesn't. Purdue doesn't. Kansas doesn't. North Carolina doesn't. Arizona doesn't. UCLA doesn't. Iowa State doesn't. Villanova doesn't. Syracuse doesn't. Georgetown doesn't. Maryland doesn't. Kentucky doesn't. Louisville doesn't. There's an awful lot of college basketball royalty there, plus one of the best home court atmospheres in the country (ISU). And NONE of them have the students with the premium seats (according to the arena seating charts for each of those schools).
2. The seats the students have now are hardly bad. Say what you will about Carver's generally stale atmosphere/design, but there isn't a bad seat in the building. There certainly aren't steel beams presenting obstructed views like there were in the Field House (yet oddly the poor views didn't seem to prevent the FH from being an intimidating environment).
3. The students need to earn that type of privilege. They can't just expect to have it handed to them when they haven't done jack **** to show they would actually fill those seats on any kind of consistent basis. Sure, they'd have filled it for MSU/Purude this year. But they wouldn't provide the kind of atmosphere you're hoping for on a nightly basis.
4. When the program was in rough shape, you could reasonably pitch this as a way to generate excitement. But we have a top 5 team this year. The students (plus any "move the students" proponents) can't use the current seating chart as a crutch for a pathetic atmosphere. You shouldn't need those seats to go crazy for this team.
Refs were horrible. They eliminated any game flow.