WinOneThisCentury
Well-Known Member
Seriously, give me a break. 4th...behind Nebraska? I get Wisconsin and NW...although I think Iowa should be a dead heat with NW. But Nebraska irks me. I'm sorry, but history should matter and plugging in a tape of a recent 40-10 beat down should matter.
I get this is a prediction, but past results are part of the prediction process for future results and right now, at the end of a grueling season, Nebraska doesn't measure up to the physicality of the Iowa Hawkeyes. If our coaching staff elected to punt out of bounds twice in 2014, we would have 4 straight wins and working on 5 this year. That was an early Christmas gift to the Big Red in 2014.
Nebraska should have to prove it at the end of the year...and until they do, giving them the benefit of the doubt is a sign of ignorance and bias (of success in years long gone by). The emperor has long been naked in regard to Nebraska, but polling like this leads you to believe he's still thinking their defense wears black shirts...rather than pink.
I get this is a prediction, but past results are part of the prediction process for future results and right now, at the end of a grueling season, Nebraska doesn't measure up to the physicality of the Iowa Hawkeyes. If our coaching staff elected to punt out of bounds twice in 2014, we would have 4 straight wins and working on 5 this year. That was an early Christmas gift to the Big Red in 2014.
Nebraska should have to prove it at the end of the year...and until they do, giving them the benefit of the doubt is a sign of ignorance and bias (of success in years long gone by). The emperor has long been naked in regard to Nebraska, but polling like this leads you to believe he's still thinking their defense wears black shirts...rather than pink.