deanvogs
Well-Known Member
Most people thought ISU and KSU, while the 4th/5th best teams in the league would be bubble teams at best. All the offseason talk of UT was if Barnes would be fired. All of the teams have been in the top 25 at times and all will easily be in the tourney barring a meltdown.
The only team that is an outlier between both conferences is TCU. They are awful. However when national pundits look at the conferences they don't attempt to descern the merits of TT vs. PSU. They are both just teams good enough to jump up and beat somebody but just not that good either.
I think the reason that the Big 12 gets some benefit of the doubt from national guys like Rothstein and Goodman is that the league is a round robin, and they are looking at 6 of 10 teams getting in, and the Big 10 looks like 6 of 12. Possibly 5 each but I think both will get six as I think Minny will do enough to get in, and WVU or OSU will still do enough to get in.
Lunardi's latest bracketology has the Big 12 with the following seeds: 2, 3, 6, 6, 8, 9
They have the Big 10 at : 3, 3, 4, 5, 5, 11
Really not a whole lot of separation there especially considering the Big 12 only has 10 teams.
Big12, and BIG are about a push. The Big12 big advantage, is that Baylor was thought to be a top 20 team, and Okie st. a team to contend for a top seed and conference championship. So the perception is they are very deep. As it turns out, neither will even be a tourney teams.
I haven't looked at Lunardi's stuff, but I only see 5 making it from the Big12 (Kansas, KState, ISU, Texas, and OU). Okie st. will lose several and won't make it, same with Baylor, and WVU already has 10 losses, and will have another 3 or 4 with their schedule.