http://thegazette.com/subject/sports/quickest-slants-the-personal-foul-20140923#btXlMzMLRLDI3EYC.99
Timeouts were gone with more than 7 minutes left . . . If there was a problem with C.J. Beathard’s performance, it was timeouts. That shouldn’t be an “if.” Iowa called its final timeout of the game with 7:42 left in the game. So, it was sort of “all in” on the TD drive in which Iowa took the 24-20 lead. They lived to tell about it. This time.
The first timeout came on a third-and-9 play with 1:16 left in the third quarter. Iowa wanted to set up two plays. The first was a called handoff to RB Damon Bullock. If he gaind 5 yards, Iowa was going to go for it on fourth down. He was stopped for no gain and the field goal unit ran onto the field.
Totally understand this timeout.
Iowa called another timeout with 8:19 left in the game to set up a fourth-and-1 play that RB Mark Weisman converted. This timeout makes sense.
The one that didn’t, and seemed to rankle the Iowa sideline, was the one Beathard called with 7:42 left. Weisman had just converted a fourth-and-1 to set up a first-and-goal from Pitt’s 1. Then, the timeout.
That was a long way to go without the safety net of a timeout. There was trouble getting the play called. It was an expensive timeout, but it also avoided a first-and-goal from the 6. Iowa was great in short yardage vs. Pitt, but that would’ve been pushing it.
“When you have a new quarterback, we’ve better get that cleaned up,” Ferentz said. “We didn’t have any options there at the end. That’s . . . I get it, I’m not happy about it, but I get it.”
It's funny, I read that differently during the game. It thought it looked like CJ was p****d that the play was messed up and called time out and started letting the sidelines know his frustration and KF was making a calm down motion with his hands.
My question is, "How many times would Iowa gone ahead and run a play in which everyone was not on the same page and ended up getting stuffed or having a false start?"
But KF complaining about Time outs? Seriously?