How many of you were actually a little let down to see Jake pull that win off on Saturday knowing that meant his grip in the starting position just got tighter?
Or, maybe the light went off in Jake's head that receivers can get open if you let them finish their routes. Open question right now. Can't blame those that want CJ to play, but Jake's played well enough. A running game might help, by the way.
Yes, Kirk should have seen that Brad Banks was a better option than Kyle McCann.
Yes, Kirk should have seen that Ricky Stanzi was a better option than Jake Christensen.
...but to say, that we are happy to see Iowa lose, because we would rather have QB1 in, instead of QB2, is dishonest, silly, or both.
No. No. No. No. No. Banks was used in the ways that he could be used. It has been said a lot of times that Banks didn't have nearly the grasp of the playbook that McCann had, and starting Banks would have really limited how much Iowa could do on offense in '01.
No. No. No. No. No. Banks was used in the ways that he could be used. It has been said a lot of times that Banks didn't have nearly the grasp of the playbook that McCann had, and starting Banks would have really limited how much Iowa could do on offense in '01.
How many of you were actually a little let down to see Jake pull that win off on Saturday knowing that meant his grip in the starting position just got tighter?