If you can accept losing, you can't win.
Vince Lombardi
Would also be back2back BCS wins which only OSU can claim? and the two wins would be more than Mich.Going to a Rosebowl would mean the 3rd BCS bowl since 2000, which would put us in pretty good company.
With the theory scUM and PSU don't go to a BCS game this year, then, in the Big-10 only tOSU and scUM can say the same thing.
(PSU Orange 05 and Rose 08)
(scUM Rose 03, 04, 06)
(tOSU Fiesta 02, 03, 05, and 08; NC game 06, 07; Rose 09)
I'd take it.
Also, it would shut the Wisconsin fans the hell up we've never won a rose bowl since 1958, even with Hayden Fry, and, that KF has never gone to one.
Not me, a Win is way better than a loss.These numbers still surprise me. How many who voted for the Rose bowl win would change thier mind if i inserted Florida, USC, Alabama or Texas into the BCS game?
These numbers still surprise me. How many who voted for the Rose bowl win would change thier mind if i inserted Florida, USC, Alabama or Texas into the BCS game?
Id still take the guaranteed win and its the rose bowl. Could you imagine how sweet it would look with a rose in the mouth of a tigerhawkMaybe the better question would be: Garaunteed Rose Bowl win or a place in the NCG agianst a historical power of your choosing (not knowing the outcome)?
If it were me, I would have to take the shot at the NC. Just playing in the NC is great but if you could trade a garaunteed win for a toss up would you?
Great point, thanks.Would also be back2back BCS wins which only OSU can claim? and the two wins would be more than Mich.