Barkley Hill's Smile?

He wouldn't.....the specualtion by many was that hed play WR or Sfty in college.

Well that was what someone suggested when they said, based on what happened with Garmon... Garmon to WR. He came here to play RB, that is one of the main reasons Iowa got him and he is not going to play WR unless he wants to.
 
Why would Garmon go from RB to WR because he got charged with possession? This makes no sense.

i put him like that not because of his arrest but because i have always thought that bullock or garmon...one of the would be a rb full time and one would by a rb/wr type. i am now thinking that garmon would be better in that role although i have gone back and forth with it. i am not moving him out of rb i am just thinking that we have 3 really talented rbs and we need to find as many ways to get playmakers on the field. davis wants playmakers and though they are young i think our 3 best playmakers on offense will be those 3 rbs. i could very well be wrong it is just my view right now. in a week or so i could see it differently as news comes out of who is doing well and who isnt.
 
i put him like that not because of his arrest but because i have always thought that bullock or garmon...one of the would be a rb full time and one would by a rb/wr type. i am now thinking that garmon would be better in that role although i have gone back and forth with it. i am not moving him out of rb i am just thinking that we have 3 really talented rbs and we need to find as many ways to get playmakers on the field. davis wants playmakers and though they are young i think our 3 best playmakers on offense will be those 3 rbs. i could very well be wrong it is just my view right now. in a week or so i could see it differently as news comes out of who is doing well and who isnt.

Ah, I see.
 
Top