Banks > Griffin

[Stiles]

I want whatever Ferentz4life is smoking.

I believe the NFL scouts know a little more than you. Apparently nobody on this board agrees with you either.

 

[ferentz4life]

I want whatever Ferentz4life is smoking.

I believe the NFL scouts know a little more than you. Apparently know one on this board agrees with you either.

Good post, but unfortunately the OP said nothing about who would be a better NFL QB. Premises, however, often get shifted so people can try and support their own positions.

Anyway, it's too bad this thread degenerated into a "you are dumb" thread. I respect your opinions, just disagree with them. Take it easy, folks.

 

[tm3308]

Good post, but unfortunately the OP said nothing about who would be a better NFL QB. Premises, however, often get shifted so people can try and support their own positions.

Anyway, it's too bad this thread degenerated into a "you are dumb" thread. I respect your opinions, just disagree with them. Take it easy, folks.

Griffin had a better individual season than Banks, too. Seriously, how can you be this thick-headed?

 

[treehenry]

Banks was awesome for the hawks but this thread is a joke.

 

[Doublewide]

Good post, but unfortunately the OP said nothing about who would be a better NFL QB. Premises, however, often get shifted so people can try and support their own positions.

Anyway, it's too bad this thread degenerated into a "you are dumb" thread. I respect your opinions, just disagree with them. Take it easy, folks.

Ummmm Ok.

 

[CptPuertoRico]

This is fantastic.

Banks was a very good player, but RGIII is on a whole other level. That isn't a dig on Banks, it's just praise on Griffin. He is one of the best college players I have seen in quite some time. By game 5 he still had more TD passes then incompletions, how is that even possible?

 

[tm3308]

Good post, but unfortunately the OP said nothing about who would be a better NFL QB. Premises, however, often get shifted so people can try and support their own positions.

Anyway, it's too bad this thread degenerated into a "you are dumb" thread. I respect your opinions, just disagree with them. Take it easy, folks.

Not all opinions are created equal. And this one is completely out of left field.

 

[Liq]

Either you did not watch the 2002 Hawkeyes or you are dumb (or both). Which is it?

I think you should double check your numbers. RGIII almost threw for 4k yards with a 6-1 TD/INT ratio and rushed for almost 650 yards and 9 scores.

Thats probably one of the best single seasons a QB has ever had in college football. If he had half the help Banks had they would probably be in the NC game.

 

[truehawk]

Ok lets all just agree the Jake christansen is the best QB and call it a night. I think that's something we can all agree on.

 

[piperhawk]

Ok lets all just agree the Jake christansen is the best QB and call it a night. I think that's something we can all agree on.

Touche

 

[clicheusername3]

Good post, but unfortunately the OP said nothing about who would be a better NFL QB. Premises, however, often get shifted so people can try and support their own positions.

Anyway, it's too bad this thread degenerated into a "you are dumb" thread. I respect your opinions, just disagree with them. Take it easy, folks.

When Stiles is posting on you it's time to move on. Thanks for coming in on this one Stiles.

 

[ATLHawkeye]

This is easy. Banks was awesosme... RGIII is awesomer!

 

[CloneHawk]

This discussion starts and ends with one statement.

He made Baylor relevant in football. BAYLOR!