Wrong.There's one myth debunked; time to come up with a new excuse.
Wrong.There's one myth debunked; time to come up with a new excuse.
Unless Delany could cause a population shift from the Sun Belt states to the midwest, he was going to lose anyway. Look at where the vast majority of the top 100 recruits are from, the B10 was never going to be able to outrecruit the SEC in their own backyard.
I think they are so good because they get the best players in the country, and in Alabama's case, have the best coach in the country.
How about academic requirements for their scholarship athletes?
And as I pointed out in my post about ISU's recruiting, you can't just go off of Rivals. Alabama according to rivals signed 26 guys in 2010. That's actually wrong, they signed 29. However, 11 of them had already enrolled at semester. Only 18 of them signed LOI's.
Alabama’s 2010 recruiting class | Capstone Report
Same deal in 2012 - TJ Yeldon was a Jan. enrollee, thus never signed an LOI.
It may be skirting the rules a bit. But it's not oversigning. Everybody that signed an LOI got a scholarship, and kids aren't getting screwed.
I agree. Oversigning accelerated it.
And its the population shift that will ultimately kill the B1G & why adding just Nebraska was a colossal failure. The B1G held a massive population advantage for virtually ever until the recent and continuing shift south and west. The conference didn't address it even though Iowa's Gary Barta even mentioned the "sun belt" during expansion. Others as well.
States like Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina and even Missouri should have been added. But those schools probably didn't want to come because they see what's happening.
The B1G is just the MAC with a bigger paycheck.
There is no doubt that they are winning as they have the most talent. However, if they took 3-4 less players per year, those players would be playing somewhere else making those teams that much better....trickle down. We have seen how much difference one or two players can make. I believe that was the idea and the reason for the scholarship limits in the first place. It may not make an overwhelming difference, but it would be nice if everyone played by the same rules.
Wrong.
Right.
There's one myth debunked; time to come up with a new excuse.
Mizzou was practically begging to get into the B1G. And those other schools in Virginia and Maryland would have listened, too. But now the SEC has gobbled up Mizzou and the ACC has a huge penalty for those wanting to leave. The B1G has handcuffed it's self in many ways because they are about academics as well not just athletics. Even though there have been violations from B1G teams they are still moral and ethical compared to most southern schools.
Jon why post this then disappear ?
If you bothered to read any of the links,you would know that as an example in 2011 Bama had only 9 schollys to give,but they ended up signing 22, and found a way to get rid of 13 guys...presumbly none-performers. Being able to do over a 5 year period gives them 40-50 extra bodies to choose their roster from....if that is not an advantage, then send them to Iowa. Problem is,they signed LOI's with Bama so they not only get to screen down to the best 85 but keep 40-50 recruits from being available to Iowas of the world.....nice scheme.
And if you bothered to read any scoreboard, you would now that Alabama and LSU are better because they have better players.