I actually don't think a QB is horrible just because his ratings are terrible. There's always the possibility of a Dan Marino type prospect stuck at a horrible program. So I took a closer (but very quick and dirty) look at the 10-teams with worst QB "ratings" to see if there's pattern or outlier in there.
Here is some raw data...fomatting is bad but I don't have a rich-text editor showing on my browser. The data lists the 10 teams (in no particular order), their average loss-margin, and also the individual actual loss margins. All the teams have losing records (not a huge surprise) but one team really stands out. Guess which one? Take a look at the numbers before forming conclusions.
MIZZ (4-5) Avg loss margin: 17 lost by: 21, 21, 4, 32, 7 * MIZZ tried 2 QB (both in bottom 10)
UMass (0-9) avg loss margin: 34 lost by: 37, 39, 50, 11, 3, 38, 22, 42, 63
Kansas(1-8) avg loss margin: 18 lost by: 1, 14, 7, 40, 6, 45, 4, 27
Hawaii (1-7) avg loss margin:35 lost by: 33 39, 45, 47, 38, 12, 15, 35
SMU (4-5) avg loss margin: 29 lost by: 35, 45, 8, 1, 25
Colorado (1-8) avg loss margin: 34 lost by: 5, 2, 55, 28, 34, 44, 56, 48
illinois (2-7) avg loss margin: 28 lost by: 31, 28, 28, 17, 45, 14, 30
buffalo (2-7) avg loss margin: 18 lost by: 22, 16, 7, 7, 42, 14, 5
IOWA (4-5) avg loss margin: 7 lost by: 3, 1, 20, 11, 3
Now a brief analysis--
9 (8 actually because MIZZ has 2!! in worst 10 QB ratings) of these teams have average loss margins that are 3-scores and above. These loss margins indicate that they are indeed horrible TEAMS from top to bottom. They have lost most games by huge margins.
One team however has secured a single-score average loss margin.
My take on this is either that
(1) Vandy is an elite QB whose horrible rating is caused by the terrible cast (offense, defense, and ST) surrounding him. He is in reality single-handedly keeping us in games.
OR
(2) Do I have to actually connect the dots?
Is it possible that if Vandy was starting for Alabama, they might have beaten LSU by 30-points last weekend?
Here is some raw data...fomatting is bad but I don't have a rich-text editor showing on my browser. The data lists the 10 teams (in no particular order), their average loss-margin, and also the individual actual loss margins. All the teams have losing records (not a huge surprise) but one team really stands out. Guess which one? Take a look at the numbers before forming conclusions.
MIZZ (4-5) Avg loss margin: 17 lost by: 21, 21, 4, 32, 7 * MIZZ tried 2 QB (both in bottom 10)
UMass (0-9) avg loss margin: 34 lost by: 37, 39, 50, 11, 3, 38, 22, 42, 63
Kansas(1-8) avg loss margin: 18 lost by: 1, 14, 7, 40, 6, 45, 4, 27
Hawaii (1-7) avg loss margin:35 lost by: 33 39, 45, 47, 38, 12, 15, 35
SMU (4-5) avg loss margin: 29 lost by: 35, 45, 8, 1, 25
Colorado (1-8) avg loss margin: 34 lost by: 5, 2, 55, 28, 34, 44, 56, 48
illinois (2-7) avg loss margin: 28 lost by: 31, 28, 28, 17, 45, 14, 30
buffalo (2-7) avg loss margin: 18 lost by: 22, 16, 7, 7, 42, 14, 5
IOWA (4-5) avg loss margin: 7 lost by: 3, 1, 20, 11, 3
Now a brief analysis--
9 (8 actually because MIZZ has 2!! in worst 10 QB ratings) of these teams have average loss margins that are 3-scores and above. These loss margins indicate that they are indeed horrible TEAMS from top to bottom. They have lost most games by huge margins.
One team however has secured a single-score average loss margin.
My take on this is either that
(1) Vandy is an elite QB whose horrible rating is caused by the terrible cast (offense, defense, and ST) surrounding him. He is in reality single-handedly keeping us in games.
OR
(2) Do I have to actually connect the dots?
Is it possible that if Vandy was starting for Alabama, they might have beaten LSU by 30-points last weekend?