No confidence at all but with the exception of some break out seasons here or there, these 2 positions have always been a black hole at the university of Iowa.how confident are you about Iowa’s ability to recruit all-conference/ NFL WR and QBs?
Based on decades of data, I'm about zero percent confident. I HOPE Iowa can have decent QB play (with Sully, maybe?) in the next year, but the recruiting level at Iowa for these skill positions is really rough. Iowa generally recruits in the #30-50 range (team rankings) but even that is based on getting good LB, TE, OL, DL, guys.how confident are you about Iowa’s ability to recruit all-conference/ NFL WR and QBs?
You make a good point on TE usage. I'm curious if Lester's scheme does not utilize tight ends. That could potentially affect future recruiting at this position, which we have done fairly well at.The QB/WR receiver situation is interesting. WR's need QB's to get the ball and QB's need WR's to get open. We don't have receivers that can get open which kills our ability to recruit QB's and we don't have QB's that can get the ball to the WR's which kills our ability to recruit WR's. We have/had TE's but didn't seem to get them involved enough this year to really benefit either position right now so I guess the question is who comes first the QB or the WR. Can't seem to answer the Chicken or the egg scenario and I think this one's going to be even harder to figure out.
Kittle is in a similar West Coast offense with SF and he gets a ton of touches, more than the WRs do many games.You make a good point on TE usage. I'm curious if Lester's scheme does not utilize tight ends. That could potentially affect future recruiting at this position, which we have done fairly well at.