#1DieHardHawk
Well-Known Member
It's hard to say, I'm sure Kirk gave the go-ahead on the call, but, I'd bet money that the play itself was completely conceived by Brian, and, I also would bet that the call in that situation was Brian's idea. I didn't really like the call at that time either, but, if executed properly, it would have worked.I agree with everything you said except the laying the blame for the 4th down Mansell call on BF. It is the head coach who makes the call to go on 4th down and that was 4th and long with plenty of time left for PSU. Yeah it could of and should have worked but Mansell also didnt pull the trigger against Maryland late in the game on a rollout with a wideopen receiver, go watch the replay. that was a strange time to go on 4th down when you have just a 3 pt lead.
Offensive line had their struggles with an athletic quick defensive line. I just think it is time to go with a better dose of Young on one cut straight ahead runs and a good amount of Sargent if IKM tweaked an ankle.
Quicker passes to schemed wide open receivers was needed as the game went on and that pass to Sargent leaking out of the backfield was a good pass.
Defense played well enough, Recinos was very good, punting the wet ball etc give them a pass as hell PSU gave us two safeties. On another day those two safeties might have been TDs.
In the end Nate did not have an Indiana type game and only he and the coaches know why right now.
I agree about Mansell. He has shown a tendency already to struggle with his reads. Hard to blame him, though, when he only gets a few plays here and there. Also, as far as blaming goes, that is a circular argument. When players don't execute, is it because the player lacks talent/ability or is it because the coaches didn't have him prepared?