lightning1
Well-Known Member
"I was listening to Cowherd"
^here^ is the biggest problem in this scenario.
^here^ is the biggest problem in this scenario.
On paper, Iowa probably does not look that strong. Fortunately for Iowa, the game is not played on paper.
Cowherd is the kind of guy who considers every team outside the top 25 as "bad".
They could be way wrong, or they could be right...however, I dont think this will be a 'bad' Iowa team. Iowa hasn't had a 'bad team in over a decade. The 2007 team was not good, but if they had a QB they could have won a few more games...then again, the OL was the worst that year of any Ferentz year since he turned it around.
Thank you...This was my point. 8 or 9 wins is not a "bad" team.Not sure how Cowherd defines "bad", but excluding the first couple years of rebuilding, Ferentz has never had a team win less than 6 games in a season. I don't see that changing this year.. If we make a bowl game (not hard to do) I can't consider us a 'bad" team. Looking at the schedule, I wouldn't be surprised to see 8-9 wins this year.
Cowterd. Thanks for helping us stay under the radar, the best spot this Hawkeye football team to become a successful. I predict that this yeaar 99% of national sports announcers will make predictions that don't prove true. The other 1% will die before they can join the rest.
'Cowterd' - what, are you 3 years old?
I would love to see some correlary analysis done relating the pervasive belief that Iowa performs better when underrated and performs more poorly when overrated. A comparison of composite preseason rankings to end of year rankings could be done and measure the 'gap' between them. I know there is a fancy statistical methodology for this.
I remember before last season, Cowherd had Iowa as a BCS team, so it is hard to make the argument he hates them. I am sure his comments are to the fact that Iowa was a big disapointment and failed to make an impact nationally.