karras
Well-Known Member
Down year or more competitive? Having fewer undefeated teams is a good thing as far as I'm concerned. I'd rather see more balance across college football than less. I hate having the same 2-3 teams every year at the top, it's boring and not exciting at all, but will likely not change.
Is it really 2-3 teams EVERY year at the top? I challenge that notion. Let's not forget Iowa was a breath away from the playoffs in 2015. And the consolation prize of the Rose Bowl would've been orgasmic in the Fry era.
The following teams can claim some form of Nat. Title since Iowa's last national championship.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_football_national_championships_in_NCAA_Division_I_FBS
UCF
Miami
Nebraska
Florida
Florida State
Ohio State
Michigan
Penn State
USC
Alabama
Notre Dame
LSU
Oklahoma State
TCU
Auburn
Utah
Texas
Tennessee
Washington
Georgia Tech
Colorado
BYU
SMU
Pittsburgh
Arkansas
Arizona State
Georgia
Clemson
Ole Miss
Missouri
Minnesota
Syracuse
Many of the programs mentioned have gone from the pinnacle to the toilet and back again. And many programs that haven't won a national title have come close. The NCAA landscape is more competitive than most give it credit IMO.