Do ya really wanna go thru the changes one by one.
Okay, I'll start. No returning senior QB starter had ever lost his job before. So yeah, it was atypical.
12-0 last year
5-4 this year
And you think there's a difference, why? Because he's exactly the same as last year?
The run game had way more wrinkles to it last year too.
Running game had a few counters, and also broke some of our most obvious tendencies (some 3rd and short plays we rolled the QB out on PA and passed or CJ ran, not Daniels stretch EVERY TIME)
Passing game at least attempted to throw the ball down the field more than we are doing this year. We don't even try.
CJ made plays with his feet. How many huge plays did he make by escaping the pocket last year? Seemed like every game he was doing this. This year? He looks like he's lost all athletic ability
Yes, benching senior (to-be) QB's is atypical. But that's across college football. And will remain atypical for everyone, including Kirk 3.0.
And Jake was benched 7 games into his Junior(rs) year. Versus Rudock at the end of his Junior year. Jake 23 games played. Rudock 25 games played. This is not very much difference here.
And I pointed to two very big differences that go towards us being 5-4. Our 2015 receiving corps graduating or getting injured, along with the injuries along our OL with Blythe's graduation.
Running game had a few counters, and also broke some of our most obvious tendencies (some 3rd and short plays we rolled the QB out on PA and passed or CJ ran, not Daniels stretch EVERY TIME)
Passing game at least attempted to throw the ball down the field more than we are doing this year. We don't even try.
CJ made plays with his feet. How many huge plays did he make by escaping the pocket last year? Seemed like every game he was doing this. This year? He looks like he's lost all athletic ability
You're in the minority bro. If I started a poll on this topic we both know how it would turn out.
Just for fun I'll bring up the Pitt game where he went for the win instead of taking a knee. Shirley you're not going to argue that was the same old Kirk?
Message boards are overtly negative when the team is losing. I'm sure we both know that too. So yes, I'll be out numbered today for sure.
Pitt game may have been when New Kirk 3.0 was invented. I mean, it took awhile for the story to grow. But whenever someone bought it, I'm sure they would point back to the Pitt game.
Hey, I'm not the one who invented an alter ego to the HC to reconcile in my own head how I can hate a coach in 2014, while loving him in 2015, and then hating him again in 2016.
But I'll take a blue pill if your offering.
Whether there is a New Kirk, Old Kirk, or whatever. The fact is, our offense sucks. Bad.
While I don't think anyone truly believed 12-0 was going to happen again this year, none of us expected this team to SHT the bed as badly as they have. This team has quit, and it goes to the head man in charge.
KF is responsible for this. It's his program, he dictates how things are run, and when results are lacking it's up to him to fix it. He has shown next to nothing to fix the offense over 17 years
There was motivated Kirk (2015)
And there is ya-can't-fire-me Kirk
So the idea that Kirk is the same this year as last year is only something a blind person could believe.
Does this mean I'm not getting a blue pill?
I remember that fake FG attempt against ISU where we had to make a TD from about 17 yards out, if I remember correctly. Now that's something you don't see everyday from KF (or anybody). When asked why KF said, "we thought we could score". That's the type of fun stuff this team needs to play well.
You're in the minority bro. If I started a poll on this topic we both know how it would turn out.
Just for fun I'll bring up the Pitt game where he went for the win instead of taking a knee. Shirley you're not going to argue that was the same old Kirk?
Basically 50% of our passes are within 5 yards of the LOS
Very, very few are over 20+ yards