Search results

"Debatable" and "context" are two words you must have just learned because they were never considered in your coverage the past 2 months.

Not at all. Their job is to be objective so the reader can decide for themselves, not injecting their own beliefs into the story.

You’re right, I don’t like when you push your narrative or your agenda. I also don’t condone your derogatory and homophobic tweets last week. But as you’ve stated numerous times, this isn’t about you.

Now you’re just restating a question I’ve already answered.

I’m an Iowa fan and this is a fan site. Know your audience.

Why is someone who isn’t a fan publisher for a fan site? I don’t have all the answers.

Yes, that’s my presumption. That’s not the same as a call to action.

When did I say I was leaving?

Just pointing out the hypocrisy. Your hypocrisy to be exact.

Rob, in all fairness you did just make a homophobic tweet last week.

In his defense he probably will go to the other site as will the majority of us. This site isn’t going to drive traffic anymore, and good luck getting advertising dollars.

I said I was done discussing it yesterday and someone quoted me. I replied.

Lol, that’s never been the case the past 2 months. Not one day. If it’s negative it’s posted or tweeted instantly. If it’s positive it’s posted in a 24-48 hour window if at all. If you don’t see that then you’re not paying close enough attention.

I couldn’t find it after a quick google search. I’m guessing it was on a podcast or on twitter. Doyle was the only assistant allowed to communicate with NFL scouts - as I type this I think there may be a caveat, it may have been just during the season.

It was reported

It’s Doyle. He was the only assistant allowed to communicate with NFL scouts.

I don’t want anything and this will be the last time I point it out. The excuses you just made are far too convenient, and obviously not the case. He’s tried to insinuate myself and others were wrong because we didn’t feel he was covering it neutrally. Whether he realizes it or not it was...

We’re told by Rob this whole time that he’s had no agenda. Yet, on the day the report comes out he’s as silent as he’s been through this entire 2 month period. It’s laughable to even pretend at this point.

I wasn’t aware there were 3 reports. Do you know what they are, and why they wouldn’t be made public? Is it possible the report released today was compilation of the 3 reports?

It’s not as though they didn’t do their jobs, it’s just that it had already became public. If someone comes along and writes a book about WW2 I’m not going to discredit them because there’s nothing in the book I didn’t already consume previously. This is the 3rd party view we haven’t gotten in...