trj
Well-Known Member
I don't disagree with this, but you don't want to burn him out either. To me, 30 to 32 minutes is about right.
Just my 2¢ .. .. GO HAWKS!!!
The Iowa team is better if CW can give you quality minutes off the bench at the point.
I don't disagree with this, but you don't want to burn him out either. To me, 30 to 32 minutes is about right.
Just my 2¢ .. .. GO HAWKS!!!
I am honestly baffled by this website.
The Iowa team is better if CW can give you quality minutes off the bench at the point.
I'm not sure he's good enough to be that guy in my opinion
I would love to see CW or Doc take a step up and become a viable option at the point. Don't get me wrong. JBo is still the #1 - 1. It would be nice to have a competent alternative for when JBo needs a breather.The Iowa team is better if CW can give you quality minutes off the bench at the point.
CW is long, can defend, rebound and score at the rim in transition, and IIRC he can make his FTs. If he can avoid TOs, he can be a Shaun Livingston type sub (that's right 56, that makes JBo S Curry)
CW is long, can defend, rebound and score at the rim in transition, and IIRC he can make his FTs. If he can avoid TOs, he can be a Shaun Livingston type sub (that's right 56, that makes JBo S Curry)