I think this will be what we call an "8-4 or 9-3" team but with a better record. Of course when it happens, and I'm watching, I'm believing everything I see and rationalizing why they'll beat an SEC team with the same record. That is why we need to get Alabama on the schedule.
The critics can say what they want, but if the Hawks do actually win the big 10 they have to beat some good teams to do it.
Iowa's schedule is very manageable. Their 2 toughest games of the year are probably their last two games of the year at home vs. Wisconsin and Nebraska. I know that the road games at Pitt and Minnesota may be considered toss ups, but I don't think I am crazy to say that the Hawks have a realistic shot at possibly starting out 10-0 with Wisconsin coming into Kinnick. You don't have to agree with me, but show me a game on this year's schedule before the Wisconsin game that the Hawks shouldn't be favored to win. Injuries and luck will have a lot to to with outcomes, but I think this year could be special.
Iowa would have to be 13-0 to make the playoff. There's no way the a 1-loss Hawkeye team gets into the playoffs with this year's schedule.
If Iowa is 12-1 and wins their last 3 vs. ranked Wisconsin, Nebraska and OSU we could still make the tournament.
If we lose to anyone not named Wisconsin, Nebraska, Michigan State or Ohio State, we ain't getting into the playoff. Any team that loses to any of the other teams on our schedule doesn't deserve that, and the pollsters will kill us for it.
If we lose to anyone not named Wisconsin, Nebraska, Michigan State or Ohio State, we ain't getting into the playoff. Any team that loses to any of the other teams on our schedule doesn't deserve that, and the pollsters will kill us for it.
There is still the possibility that Iowa's offense is a juggernaut, this season. If Iowa wins in dominating fashion, and loses a shootout to either WUs or kNU, but still wins the B1G championship game, they could still get in. But this points to my frustration with KF's offensive philosophy of "don't lose the game on offense." This doesn't allow for the appearance of being a dominant team.
The $EC is way overrated this season and a 1 loss (championship game loser, let's say) is not more deserving than a 1 loss B1G championship game winner, even if that is Iowa with their schedule; if they play dominant football the entire season. With a 4 team playoff, the B1G should not be the conference left out between the $EC, ACC, Pac12, Big 12 and B1G. Just shouldn't happen.
I would argue that with Iowa's schedule, KF really has no choice but to let it all hang out, on offense, and try to score in the 30's and 40's all season long. If this is their only chance at making the playoff, then that is how the season should be game planned. Otherwise, if Iowa plays the same old, same old conservative offense, winning games in low scoring fashion and by 3 to 10 points, you're effectively not playing to make the playoffs.
If I had wheels, I'd be a wagon.
Until the season has played out and a champion has been crowned, it's all IF. I'm not sure what you're comment means.
It's pretty simple. If making the playoff hinges on Ferentz opening things up in a big way offensively, then there's really no point discussing it. Because that's extremely unlikely to happen. Just like it's unlikely that I'm about to suddenly grow wheels and become a wagon.
But a lot less likely than you already being a smart*ss. Got it. Hey look, I get it, KF is one of the most conservative college coaches there is, today. I outlined how it "could" happen. But you're right, it isn't likely that he, all of a sudden, will allow the OC to open up the offense. But, that was part of my point. I'm glad you picked up on it. That is what Iowa fans are left with; a coach that isn't willing to take a risk to go for it. But couldn't you had found a different approach in responding than being a pure smart*ss?