The WSJ didn't seem to account for WHY Iowa was involved in so many nailbiters.
Having to play freshman RBs, significant juggling on the OL, and having to deal with Stanzi transitioning to a more prominent role in the O were all factors that contributed to our difficulties.
The nice thing to notice now is:
- To my knowledge, the OL made it through camp pretty healthy. Apart from Gettis, we still have 4 top guys starting on the OL. That's pretty good.
- Stanzi has a nice track record of playing better ball when there is a running game that has his back. Furthermore, he has shown a great aptitude for improving his game in the areas where he places added focus. Reas this as: Stanzi will most likely play more cleanly
- Iowa is a good bit more experience at RB. When Hampton gets back ... we'll feature 2 guys who are each in their 3rd season in the program ... and they each have A LOT of quality carries under their respective belts. The RB situation, entering the 2010 season, is much better than it was when we were entering the '09 season.
Oh yeah .... and with our top 5 guys on the DL ... who doesn't believe that our D is poised to be even better?