Mademyaccount4u
Well-Known Member
With the recent, and overwhelming topic of Oliver Martin the topic is "why would a receiver come to Iowa?"
To break this down I look at the major reason to attend a college on an academic scholarship:
Emotion/legacy - I've been a fan my whole life and/or my parents went there. I would also throw in charismatic coach.
Education - The school has great academics or specializes in the students desired academics. (Ivy leagues etc.)
Prestige - The school is known for, as a whole, being good at a specific sport. (Michigan, Nebraska)
Winning - The school has a coach, system, or schedule conducive to winning even without history. (Baylor)
Playing time/position - a reason many transfer and the reason many athletes are recruited successfully as a QB.
Preparation for the next level - Going to this school with help you get to the NFL.
Facilities/ - Most people like nice, new things.
Of these things I see Prestige and Winning being close to each other at the top followed by legacy and playing time, and since we don't see all the best players with offers from Stanford/NW/Harvard/Penn attending at these schools, nor a line of 4/5 star linemen beating down the doors at Iowa I put these categories last. Obviously, there is much more than just these things involved including more than one of these reason making the decision, but to break it down, for me at least, I believe one thing can be the strongest pull (Lazard and the legacy versus nearly every other reason).
So, why NOT come to Iowa as a receiver?
Iowa has a good education, but they are not elite, at least not enough to get you to play football, for most people. Iowa doesn't have a history of preparing WR's for the league, though I suppose you could point to the WR coach and how many players he put into the league at Texas and that Iowa runs a pro-style offense. Iowa is not a prestigious school when it comes to football, they just aren't a blue blood (at least yet) nor are they getting 4/5 star players based on the 90's, looking at you Nebraska and Michigan.
So, why come to Iowa as a receiver?
Winning, if you'd like to be on a top 10 team, statistically, over the past 18 years (Ferentz's tenure) Iowa has ended the year as at top 10 team 5 times, yes there are schools with better winning %, but if you want to be on a winning team, especially with the recent recruiting classes, Iowa is a safe bet. A legacy doesn't need much explanation, but the current coaching staff is open and honest. The facilities are great at Iowa, 4 years ago this would have been a detriment. Iowa will build your body into an NFL body, their S&C is second to none. Iowa needs more good receivers, there isn't stellar talent on the depth chart, giving talented players opportunity. Finally, if you're good enough, you'll make it to the next level, ask Matt Cassel.
To break this down I look at the major reason to attend a college on an academic scholarship:
Emotion/legacy - I've been a fan my whole life and/or my parents went there. I would also throw in charismatic coach.
Education - The school has great academics or specializes in the students desired academics. (Ivy leagues etc.)
Prestige - The school is known for, as a whole, being good at a specific sport. (Michigan, Nebraska)
Winning - The school has a coach, system, or schedule conducive to winning even without history. (Baylor)
Playing time/position - a reason many transfer and the reason many athletes are recruited successfully as a QB.
Preparation for the next level - Going to this school with help you get to the NFL.
Facilities/ - Most people like nice, new things.
Of these things I see Prestige and Winning being close to each other at the top followed by legacy and playing time, and since we don't see all the best players with offers from Stanford/NW/Harvard/Penn attending at these schools, nor a line of 4/5 star linemen beating down the doors at Iowa I put these categories last. Obviously, there is much more than just these things involved including more than one of these reason making the decision, but to break it down, for me at least, I believe one thing can be the strongest pull (Lazard and the legacy versus nearly every other reason).
So, why NOT come to Iowa as a receiver?
Iowa has a good education, but they are not elite, at least not enough to get you to play football, for most people. Iowa doesn't have a history of preparing WR's for the league, though I suppose you could point to the WR coach and how many players he put into the league at Texas and that Iowa runs a pro-style offense. Iowa is not a prestigious school when it comes to football, they just aren't a blue blood (at least yet) nor are they getting 4/5 star players based on the 90's, looking at you Nebraska and Michigan.
So, why come to Iowa as a receiver?
Winning, if you'd like to be on a top 10 team, statistically, over the past 18 years (Ferentz's tenure) Iowa has ended the year as at top 10 team 5 times, yes there are schools with better winning %, but if you want to be on a winning team, especially with the recent recruiting classes, Iowa is a safe bet. A legacy doesn't need much explanation, but the current coaching staff is open and honest. The facilities are great at Iowa, 4 years ago this would have been a detriment. Iowa will build your body into an NFL body, their S&C is second to none. Iowa needs more good receivers, there isn't stellar talent on the depth chart, giving talented players opportunity. Finally, if you're good enough, you'll make it to the next level, ask Matt Cassel.