FreddyBrown
Moderator
Discuss. I'd say debate, but there really can't be one, can there?
Discuss. I'd say debate, but there really can't be one, can there?
We have low enough tempo / lack of possessions as it is, I don't think Stalling will help anything. Instead of Stalling, we should be attacking the basket.
We have low enough tempo / lack of possessions as it is, I don't think Stalling will help anything. Instead of Stalling, we should be attacking the basket.
Yes. I have defended Lick on here, and Stallings was the guy that I wanted to get the job based on what he had done at Vanderbilt in a pretty difficult conference.
I hope that Lick is successful, but I was kind of heartbroken when Stallings didn't get the job.
First the comedic response to "Who found Fuller?" and now this. What are you, Shecky Greene?
;-)
Red KlotzWhen you get right down to it...can you think of any coach that could have done worse than lick so far?
Yes. Stallings, who I admit I was not real excited about,just like lick,at hiring time, has proven his ability to attract NBA quality recruits to a high academic institution.
I have not watched that much Vandy bb, but at least his ''system'' does not drive top talent away,evidently...so yes, Stallings would have been much better.
When you get right down to it...can you think of any coach that could have done worse than lick so far?
Get rid of the "-" and you would.
Or insert an emoticon from the the right.