Woodbury and Basabe
- Thread starter tednugentfan
- Start date
1hawkeye1
Well-Known Member
Number three scoring offense in the B1G.
BIG TEN CONFERENCE Official Athletic Site - Men's Basketball
tm3308
Well-Known Member
Not all trolls are created equal.
atomicblue224
Well-Known Member
I noticed we're fine in every stats especially we're first in defense of 3 pt and rebounding the only place where we sucks is 3 pt percentage.I think we're doing fine .Go Hawks
I do as well, he isn't a cry baby on the floor and he works really hard and he definitely deserves to start.
atomicblue224
Well-Known Member
Let me rephrase my answer, I like this better than when we had Licklighter as coach . Michigan state at Iowa that game put me to sleep 36 to something i cant remember. my point is as long we have uptempo offenses i think we're fine.
FG% is 7th, 3-Point% is 11th. Being #1 in offensive rebounding is the only reason they are 3rd in scoring.
Iowa is 11th in defensive rebounding, I wouldn't call that "fine".
atomicblue224
Well-Known Member
Well still we could be better but we're improving i think we're ready to smooth over the teams in BTT and hopefully NCAA
tm3308
Well-Known Member
9th in defensive rebounding %. In DRPG, Iowa is 2nd in the Big Ten and 12th nationally. 3rd in ORPG, 4th in OR%. Iowa's rebounding is fine.
HomerChampless
Well-Known Member
It's because of Iowa's great three point shooters... the offensive rebounding category.
HomerChampless
Well-Known Member
How can Iowa's offense be 'fine' when Fran depends on Roy Devyn to score?
bcl20
Well-Known Member
Has anyone said Iowa's offense is fine? Iowa's a really good rebounding (which is what tm said). Iowa is 214th in FG % which obviously, is not fine. But I don't think anyone made that claim.
Obviously, our rebounding is bolstered by the poor shooting percentage but still, we're 14th in the nation in this category (I had no idea we were that good at rebounding), pretty good.
Obviously, our rebounding is bolstered by the poor shooting percentage but still, we're 14th in the nation in this category (I had no idea we were that good at rebounding), pretty good.
HomerChampless
Well-Known Member
Who's the only non-Fran recruit that's had any playing time? Mayyyyy. So, what were you trying to say/snipe?
HomerChampless
Well-Known Member
So, when is Fran going to wise up and stop depending on Roy Devyn? Or is that why Roy Devyn had a few game stretch which he didn't contribute much? He wasn't counted upon?
The post has iterated back to my first line.
HomerChampless
Well-Known Member
Marble is a head case. And Fran has been 'buffaloed' into counting on him because, otherwise, we get nada from Marble.
Anyway, against NW and PSU? How about against teams with athletes that are more of a matchup with him? Like most of the B1G?
Anyway, against NW and PSU? How about against teams with athletes that are more of a matchup with him? Like most of the B1G?
Last edited:
tm3308
Well-Known Member
He didn't look good against those teams in the first meetings, either. There's an awful lot of jumping to conclusions here, and I don't think it's fair to Marble.
