Wiscy showing something every body on here needs to see

redhawk55

Banned
its amazing what a healthy OL and a solid group of RB's can do.
they don't use gimmick plays nor do they use a spread offense, and they use a PP for a QB
3:35 left in the 3rd Quarter 550 total yards of which 449 are on the ground
 
Why does this need to be a new thread? There are 2 other game threads you could have posted this in.
 
I would agree. But, I do think they have shown some different offensive looks and misdirection. Also, have attacked down field a few times.

This would be still to aggressive for Ferentz/Davis.
 
How many times in 14 years has Captain Conservative come within 25 points of 63 after 4 quarters, let alone after 3?
 
its amazing what a healthy OL and a solid group of RB's can do.
they don't use gimmick plays nor do they use a spread offense, and they use a PP for a QB
3:35 left in the 3rd Quarter 550 total yards of which 449 are on the ground

If you are implying that something like this is possible at Iowa, it ain't. Not with this staff.
 
Full senile mode still kicking herby. Everything Biels and Wisky has shown tonight is in full conflict with KF's so called "football philosophies".
 
its amazing what a healthy OL and a solid group of RB's can do.
they don't use gimmick plays nor do they use a spread offense, and they use a PP for a QB
3:35 left in the 3rd Quarter 550 total yards of which 449 are on the ground[/QUOTE

it would never happen. KF has to have balance. Iowa would start throwing one yard outs to keep the run and pass offense balanced. It sucks but its the truth.
 
the only thing I am inferring/ implying is Iowa does not need gimmicks to win. and just meant that Iowa was hindered by a OL and RB group that was riddled with injuries
when the OL was healthy and at its best they beat MSU, not to mention Weisman had over 800 yards rushing and over a 100 yards receiving in just "6" Games, that's a total of over 900 total yards, which breaks down to a 150 yard per game effort.
in that same MSU game Weisman got hurt, then in the PSU game 2 of Iowa's best OL went down to injury for the year. after that game it became a revolving door at both the RB and OL position.
again at the beginning of the season there were 3 brand new starters on the OL, and the RB spot was a big question mark
95% of the Posters were predicting anywhere from 5-7 at WORST to 7-5 at best, because of all the 1st time starters and all the coaching changes.
but as the season progressed you could have swore by the way people were going nuts after every loss, that they had predicted a BT Title and NT
 
the only thing I've seen is Wisky taking advantage of their opportunity to elevate their program, while Iowa ****** theirs away.
 
the only thing I am inferring/ implying is Iowa does not need gimmicks to win.

I can't speak for the others, but I think Wisconsin's playcalling and design has shown 10x the innovation tonight than I've seen out of Iowa in a long time.
 
the only thing I've seen is Wisky taking advantage of their opportunity to elevate their program, while Iowa ****** theirs away.


Couldn't agree more. Was thinking the same thing. This is everything the Hawks could have kept going after 3 top ten finishes.
 
the only thing I've seen is Wisky taking advantage of their opportunity to elevate their program, while Iowa ****** theirs away.
and you have no clue..
beating a dead horse.. Recruiting is the biggest thing in college football, and Iowa has been correcting that.
rather than getting 12 to 14 2 "STAR" recruits each year and just 1 to 2 4 "STAR" recruit each year,
that has changed since 2010
15 4 "STAR" RECRUITS
41 3 "STAR" RECRUITS AND JUST
15 2 "STAR" RECRUITS, with 3 of those 15 being kickers. one of which is Meyer.
even this year there only 1 2 "STAR" RECRUIT, the rest are 3 "star recruits with a total of 3 4 "STAR" RECRUITS by different sites
of those 15 4"STAR" RECRUITS just 3 have left. Derby, Coker and Coe never made it..
4 others are RS'ing this season. and 4* Garmon played this year
 
Last edited:
They're 8-5.

We're 4-8. What's your point?

the only thing I've seen is Wisky taking advantage of their opportunity to elevate their program, while Iowa ****** theirs away.

This. This has been a down year for Wisconsin, and they've not had many of those since 2004. Everybody still talks about Iowa and Wisconsin like they're on the same level. They're not anymore. They were in 2004, when both were vying to become the third Big Ten power. Wisky jumped all over, and Iowa let it slip away (twice, actually).
 
Didnt Wisky use a wildcat formation at the goal line? And didnt they run a half back pass to the QB? Those are gimmicks.
Get used to off tackle left, If we have a strong LT. If not, then its off tackle right.
Then the before mentioned 1 yard out.
Horizontal passing game with a power run game. No gimmicks, not hard to defend.
 

Latest posts

Top