As usual everyone is missing the biggest problem with a playoff in college football.
How do you determine who gets home field? Home field is HUGE in college football and would drastically shape who wins or plays for the title. Going to base it off the same rankings we use now that everyone complains about? Idiotic to reward the top 8 teams in any ranking with home field.
Only plausible way would be to give major conference champions a homefield game and auto entry into the playoff. At large bids would have to almost entirely be considered wild card teams and expect to play on the road....then try to justify OSU having to play at UCONN....or at TCU.
Then again we already have the NFL for that...and the NFC West looks alot like the big east....
Why ruin the greatest regular season in any sport? Why ruin the greatest week of the year between Christmas and New Years filled with bowl games?
Best idea I've read comes from Wetzel....You put together a non-biased, educated, disinterested seeding committee...just like the NCAA men's BB tourney. SOS, records, conference SOS, scores between teams, etc are used.
Is it perfect? No....#17 is always going to gripe, but, it'll be a 3-loss team or a 2-loss mid-major team if you will...and I'm fine with that. Everybody gripes at being #66 for the men's tourney, but 1-65 are pretty decent.
The seeding committee does away with the absolutely biased and stupid 2-human and 1-computer BCS polls you have now which determine who gets into the NC game and who gets the juicy BCS games.
There's a 37-day gap between the last regular season football game and the NC game. You could have that void filled right now, AND, you could STILL have your minor bowl games.
The playoff would not, in any way shape or form, take away from the bowls...it would, rather, add to them. Do some of the really silly bowls perish? Probably. Good riddance....just like it needs to be good riddance to the cartel known as the BCS.