Why not dispute the results?

[Hawknick]

That's your opinion, it is a legitimate question to ask. Why do we not see disputed results like in the early days of college football?

 

[volhawk50]

Who cares if some of those games had contested results? There was no NCAA back then. Football in the 1800s was barely more than a parking lot scrimmage and probably crookeder than a 3 dollar bill.

Sour grapes, man. Lose with some dignity.

Sour grapes doesn't really apply here, but I agree his effort is kind of sad. If we had scored a touchdown on that play the refs cancelled because LSU was making substitutions, that could be a different issue.

 

[Doublewide]

Holy chit I have now read it all.

 

[Hawknick]

Maybe the cyclown fans can help me with the 1897. I see different scores on different sites some with disputed marks and some without. Do any of you know?

edit: on a side note you guys are lucky the 1900 game was cancelled, Alden Knipe that team would have whopped you guys. He would have been 4-0 vs ISU.

 

[ibahawkeye]

Because you would wind up looking like a complete idiot.... that's why.

 

[AdamHawk]

Holy chit I have now read it all.

You know a thread has hit rock bottom when clown fans start chiming in...

 

[Xerxes]

I really think we need to have this thread deleted. It may be the most ridiculous OP I have ever seen on this board. This is something you would expect to see on Cyfan.

I have to disagree. This is a solid trolling effort in response to the ridiculous fake injury posts from numerous posters yesterday including an entire thread devoted to setting a new injury rule.

 

[spliff45]

I sure hope this is a trolling effort....