Thawki
Well-Known Member
If the idea is to give him a 5-year contract so that he can tell recruits he will be around for 5 years, then you don't let the school buy it out for almost nothing. That is pretty the same thing as a non-guaranteed contract, which can be used against the coach in recruiting just as much as a short-term contract.
and you pretty much admitted thats what you wanted, to be able to fire him easily if you wanted to.
Wrong. Once he hits 65 the part about making sure recruits know he will be there for their entire football career is out the window. He will already have other programs recruiting against his age so the part about guaranteeing the five years by having a buyout to prevent letting him go is out the window. You give him the five years pretty much for looks and out of respect, even though it really isn't a five-year guarantee.
I will admit to being lazy in my explanation, but it's not that hard and that is how you do it. The assumption is that anyone that has been there that long will leave on their own and not get pushed out. Plus, he is already being treated more than fairly with that kind of contract and not having won a conference championship in as long as it's been.
Any other questions?
Last edited: