HawkIreign
Well-Known Member
We beat GT so now he need to point out every sports writer in America that picked against us? Get over it.
Last edited:
When did our heads get so big that it isn't enough just to win the games we know he can win? WHat happened to relishing the underdog role?We all feel a need to beat our chests and tell all those who'll listen that everyone was wrong about the Hawkeyes, and we all feel disrespected because, frankly, we're in Iowa. If this were Russia, it'd be like we're in Siberia. We have no city with a population more than 250,000 within its city limits. Our population is less than 3 million total. We have no professional sports team above the Triple-A-equivalent level (the I-Cubs, Barnstormers and Energy are our highest-level teams right now). We don't have as deep a talent pool at the high-school level for colleges to recruit, and those four- and five-star recruits go out of state (i.e. Harrison Barnes). We need something to prove us to our detractors.
No, its not the board...its just everdeanmarshallhawk
Who cares...this board is to discuss topics...not to mention everyone has told us how bad Iowa is every game this year...i think its just a defense tactic to back our team because each week all we heard was negatives.
If all you heard was negative then that had to be what you looked for on a weekly basis. SUre it got pointed out that we had some luck and that our offense wasn't going to set the world on fire but all that stuff was true. It also got pointed out on a weekly basis that this team knew how to win games and had a top notch D.
All in all, the national media coverage of the Hawks this year was mostly negative!!! And the Big 10!!!
I disagree with it being negative, more like nonexistant. The teams that get massive amounts of media cover are teams that are in the BCS title hunt and the players that get coverage are Heisman contender. The BT had neither.
I disagree with it being negative, more like nonexistant. The teams that get massive amounts of media cover are teams that are in the BCS title hunt and the players that get coverage are Heisman contender. The BT had neither.
C'mon Jon, we all know that this entire season, whenever Cowherd, Holtz, or Palmer opened their mouths, there were 5 posts on this board crying about what they said.
+1000000
If all you heard was negative then that had to be what you looked for on a weekly basis. SUre it got pointed out that we had some luck and that our offense wasn't going to set the world on fire but all that stuff was true. It also got pointed out on a weekly basis that this team knew how to win games and had a top notch D.
Well, I saw coverage of the Hawks, so you cannot say it was non-existant. It was negative, but this may have been a reflection of the Big 10 as a whole. Much of it basically insinuated that Iowa was lucky and did not deserve the wins they were getting! And I don't think it is an inferiority complex, but more so justification for what we as Hawk fans knew all along!
We beat GT so now he need to point out every sports writer in America that picked against us? Get over it.