homes
Well-Known Member
This is how I feel about Big Ten expansion. I do get it. A lot more money. A lot more power. A lot more influence. But there are costs, intangible as they may seem. And I understand that newcomers and the like have no sense of history, so preserving the status quo means nothing. I'm sorry, but simply adding Nebraska and Missouri to an expanded conference does not make them a Big Ten school. Call me a snob, but it's also true.
I would just hope they don't impugn the integrity of what it meant to in the Big Ten by keeping the name after they form this new alliance of schools. Just let it die - swept into the dustbin of history.
May I suggest a new name for this "conference" - the Conference of Associated Schools for Hegemony, i.e., CASH. Because that is what this is all about - money and power.
I would just hope they don't impugn the integrity of what it meant to in the Big Ten by keeping the name after they form this new alliance of schools. Just let it die - swept into the dustbin of history.
May I suggest a new name for this "conference" - the Conference of Associated Schools for Hegemony, i.e., CASH. Because that is what this is all about - money and power.