BillSPrestonEsq
Well-Known Member
Duh, of course, and it will be so obvious because that's the only play they will put him in for...he'll miss the hole and it'll go for -1.Will we see a JP jet sweep Saturday?
Duh, of course, and it will be so obvious because that's the only play they will put him in for...he'll miss the hole and it'll go for -1.Will we see a JP jet sweep Saturday?
If Leshun Daniels touchdowns wouldn't have gotten called back, he'd be leading the B1G in total rushing yds (439), would be leading the B1G in yds. per carry (8.12) and would be 3rd in yds. per game (109.75). Our rushing total against Ratgers would've been close to 300 yds. And those runs starting the second halves of those 2 games probably would've been 'back breakers' in those games. I think we just need to keep 'pounding the rock' and wear these teams down and open up 'play action'.......
All my posts are reasonable.....if people agree with me...This is a reasonable post. Did you forget to look up on the upper left side of your screen to see who you were logged in as?
![]()
You need to study the butterfly effect before making that post. There is a fallacy belief that altering history allows for a certain outcome. It's possible, but there are no guarantees.
We're not talking about weather or chaos theory, we're talking Kirk Ferentz football. It's a pretty safe presumption that, "all other things being equal" would more accurately apply to both the predictability of everything else, as well as the reliability of the final outcome, than the butterfly effect.![]()
As someone else mentioned earlier in this thread, the one major coaching change i would make would be to have a better run/pass ratio. We've had fairly good success running the ball, we just haven't done so consistently.
To me the rest of it just comes down to something is off. I mentioned elsewhere we seem to be missing that spark that we had last year. We've seen it here and there this season for a quarter or a possesion (ISU we saw it the whole game) but haven't been able to sustain. I believe that ability is there, it's a question of when it comes together.
I am not a huge Greg Davis fan......He baffles me at times......31 passes for 142 yards. That is 4.6 YPA. 41 rushes for 179 yards for 4.4 YPR.
Our passing attack sucks, and has sucked since Greg Davis got here. It is a scheme problem, and since KF refuses to fix it one must assume he is ok with it. Davis need to go, there are so many younger and more innovative OC, that deciding to stick with Davis is just flat out embarrising.
Let's bring in a young guy who knows the QB position very well and can help recruit.31 passes for 142 yards. That is 4.6 YPA. 41 rushes for 179 yards for 4.4 YPR.
Our passing attack sucks, and has sucked since Greg Davis got here. It is a scheme problem, and since KF refuses to fix it one must assume he is ok with it. Davis need to go, there are so many younger and more innovative OC, that deciding to stick with Davis is just flat out embarrising.
He baffles me too, which was where I was going with my comment about the run/pass ratio today. Both Wadley and Daniels had gone into today with 5+ yards/carry on the season, and I haven't understood why the playcalling has gone away from the run at times this season. It has also been a recurring issue under Davis.
Passing route-wise, for people who were at the game, was wind an issue or something today? I know we only tried to go downfield the one time, and I don't recall Minnesota going downfield much either. Also, aside from one touchback, kicks and punts seemed to be shorter today also. Just asking, as that was something I was wondering about during the game.