We now have 4 RPI Top 50 Wins

The Texas loss is 100% on ISU. The KU loss...not so much.

I agree, you guys got hosed in that Kansas game. But officiating is part of the game, I keep thinking back to the foul on White in the Michigan State game and think "what if". But like ISU, Iowa had the chance to make their own breaks but kept blowing leads late in games. Good teams do not lose to Texas, Purdue, or Nebraska.
 
WE have more RPI TOP 50 wins than the following teams that are all deemed in the tournament or last few out:

North Carolina
Memphis
Kentucky
ISU
Colorado St
Creighton
Wichita St
NC St
Oregon
St. Marys
Mizzou
VCU
Oklahoma
Colorado
Belmont
Temple
La Salle
Boise St
Tennessee
Ole Miss
 
WE have more RPI TOP 50 wins than the following teams that are all deemed in the tournament or last few out:

North Carolina
Memphis
Kentucky
ISU
Colorado St
Creighton
Wichita St
NC St
Oregon
St. Marys
Mizzou
VCU
Oklahoma
Colorado
Belmont
Temple
La Salle
Boise St
Tennessee
Ole Miss


I honestly don't see what the problem is with our resume. More good wins and less bad losses. Who the hell cares that our bottom 4 teams sucked worse then everyone else's bottom 4 teams.
 
crying-child.jpg
 
I wonder what our RPI and SOS would be if you add 50 RPI to each of the bottom 7 teams we played. They would all still be pretty much sure wins still but I have a feeling it would change our RPI and SOS way more then it should. Because in reality you are just changing one terrible team for a slightly less terrible team.

Looking at the top 50 teams is fine. But after 100 its really starts to get less and less accurate.

You can't tell me there is legitimate meaningful difference between all those bad teams let alone a calculation that can accurately determine that difference.
 
Check this dudes Twitter account @hawkize, he asked Jon to change his handle to Hawkize. He also promised to never forget his password again. So he has been somebody else on here.

I am laughing at some of the tweets he is firing at Seth Davis.
 

Latest posts

Top