Just this in the latest posts sidebar and wondered why it wasn't in football... Probably for the best.
"The Iowa football team was drafting players for the annual Hawkeye Challenge, an intrasquad competition intended to reinforce the program’s culture of accountability. When the offseason began each January, players could earn points for things like good grades, strength and conditioning performance or volunteer work. They also could lose points for bad grades, missing target weights or lateness. At the end of each summer, when the offseason was over, the team with the most points won perks like skipping to the front of the meal line for the rest of the year.
Entering the draft, each player was assigned a point value based on coaches’ evaluations of their behavior during the first few weeks of the offseason. The squad gathered in a circle as the captains, who like the team itself were predominantly white, began to choose their guys. The pool of players dwindled until only Black players with negative point values were left in the middle.
“I would be last every single time,” said Wadley, one of 13 former Iowa players suing several football coaches and the university for racial discrimination. He left Iowa in 2017 as one of the most productive running backs in school history. “You can just imagine that feeling, being a guy that’s contributing to a lot of the team wins and being last. And it’s not due to anything with my performance or my work ethic.”"
Gee Akrum, I don't know, maybe show up to meetings on time and follow the rules? If the metrics are there ahead of time and you don't want to be last but still are, that seems to me like a you problem. That whole system was specifically evaluating off the field behavior, so by using his on-field production to suggest that he should have been weighted higher suggests to me that he missed the point entirely. Sort of a strange way to start the article.