HawkeyeMike23
Banned
Gamblers should avoid putting money down on any teams for which they are diehard fans.
Just bet against your team, and if they win, consider it a victory tax.
Gamblers should avoid putting money down on any teams for which they are diehard fans.
Brah, I would kill to be 29 again. You are still in that 18-34 demographic which everyone seems to care about the most. I did not think the millienums or whatever your generation is called even cared if Iowa got to another Rose Bowl.
This has got to be the year. I'm 29 in August, getting over the hill, I need the Rose Bowl or better soon! I'd go to Pasadena if I could get tickets or not.
You do realize that there is almost a ZERO percent chance that Iowa can possibly play in Pasadena this year, even if they win the Big Ten championship, right? They would actually have to make the playoffs, and even then it would only be a 50/50 shot as to whether they play in the Rose or the Sugar. The Big Ten champ does not get an automatic bid this year.
You really don't understand how this works, do you? Iowa can "win the B1G" technically with 3 or 4 losses. Simply "winning the B1G" is going to have little or no bearing on making the playoff. To do that with one of the weakest major conference schedules in the country like Iowa has, they will certainly have to go 13-0. That is about as close to a "zero percent" chance as anything you are going to find right now. Let's go ahead and call it 1%, which is even being fairly generous. And even THEN they would only have a 50% chance of playing in Pasadena, which was the original point of the post. So 50% of that 1% now becomes a 0.5% chance. Pretty damn close to zero. Go back, re-read the initial post, then come back here and apologize. We'll all wait for you.If you think Iowa can win the B1G, then they have a better than 0% chance to make the Rose Bowl.
Wrong again, chief. Conference tie-ins are irrelevant when it comes to the playoff seeding process. You really need to start reading up on some of this stuff as you're embarrassing yourself pretty good here... and I believe the champion of the conference has a pretty good chance to do so, they will likely be slotted in the Rose for the semifinal game.
Gamblers should avoid putting money down on any teams for which they are diehard fans.
Only if you are drinking the kool aid. The team you follow is the best team to wager on if you take emotion out of it.
You really don't understand how this works, do you? Iowa can "win the B1G" technically with 3 or 4 losses. Simply "winning the B1G" is going to have little or no bearing on making the playoff. To do that with one of the weakest major conference schedules in the country like Iowa has, they will certainly have to go 13-0. That is about as close to a "zero percent" chance as anything you are going to find right now. Let's go ahead and call it 1%, which is even being fairly generous. And even THEN they would only have a 50% chance of playing in Pasadena, which was the original point of the post. So 50% of that 1% now becomes a 0.5% chance. Pretty damn close to zero. Go back, re-read the initial post, then come back here and apologize. We'll all wait for you.Wrong again, chief. Conference tie-ins are irrelevant when it comes to the playoff seeding process. You really need to start reading up on some of this stuff as you're embarrassing yourself pretty good here.
This has got to be the year... I need the Rose Bowl or better soon! I'd go to Pasadena if I could get tickets or not.