Jon your entire write up is based on one game
Vandy missed several throws in his first game, and didn't play that well vs Minnesota either.
Not saying he's going to be bad, but I think you're basing your entire outlook on one game, and IMO that's a dumb thing to do.
Jon your entire write up is based on one game
Vandy missed several throws in his first game, and didn't play that well vs Minnesota either.
Not saying he's going to be bad, but I think you're basing your entire outlook on one game, and IMO that's a dumb thing to do.
Jon your entire write up is based on one game
Vandy missed several throws in his first game, and didn't play that well vs Minnesota either.
Not saying he's going to be bad, but I think you're basing your entire outlook on one game, and IMO that's a dumb thing to do.
Stanzi is to Long....what Vandenberg will be to Vlasic if that makes sense to anyone. Has a better skill set than Stanzi and would not shock me if his pro career is better, but 10 years from now it will be Stanzi who we will remember because of better bowl games, better stats, better winning pct., etc.
Time will tell if your prediction holds true, but JVB, like Vlasic, has a cannon. Time to grow the 'stache, JVB!
"...but it will be the intangibles that will tell Vandenberg’s tale…what kind of a leader is he? Does he inspire his teammates the way Stanzi did? Can he flush mistakes and come back the next drive and keep attacking? Will he spend the extra time in the film room that separates the best from the pack?
We won’t know the answers to these questions for several months."
The write up made no assertions or predictions. It's a dumb thing to assert that it did
Stanzi is to Long....what Vandenberg will be to Vlasic if that makes sense to anyone. Has a better skill set than Stanzi and would not shock me if his pro career is better, but 10 years from now it will be Stanzi who we will remember because of better bowl games, better stats, better winning pct., etc.