No kidding. Stevens says bad losses, losses away from home, and schedule strength are the red flags for Iowa's resume; look at Virginia's resume, they are worse than Iowa in all three of those categories (7 losses against the RPI 115+, to Iowa's one). Yet they are ahead of us on the bubble. Apparently Stanford has at-large hopes but we don't, even though Stanford is 0-9 against the RPI top 47 (Iowa is 4-8). At least one of those statistics is important (probably both, as they should be), thus Iowa can't be put behind both of those teams.
All the "experts" seem quick to poke holes in Iowa's resume, yet neglect the same holes if they are in someone else's resume.