Benddontbreak
Well-Known Member
Is this the first instance in which "could care less" actually makes sense?
Not sure what you’re sayin big dawg.
Is this the first instance in which "could care less" actually makes sense?
Not sure what you’re sayin big dawg.
Third, this team isn't as good as it should be, and we can all admit that. The question shouldn't be: who would win: 1992 or 2012? It's what era had the better talent? And think about the USA starting five of guys not even playing: Rose, Wade, Gay, Bosh, Howard, 6th man Griffin. That lineup could compete with any starting 5 ever. They might not win, but you cannot tell me that any starting 5 is "way more talented or way better".
Now this is an argument that's worth having. Name an Olympic year and put together the very best players from that year. Which team would be the best? My vote is for 1968, with a starting five of Oscar Robertson, Jerry West, Elgin Baylor, Bill Russell, and Wilt Chamberlain, with Lew Alicindor, Dave Bing, John Havlicek, and a couple other debatables coming off the bench.