Last I checked there are less and less teams carrying "true" FBs on their rosters. Most teams are using back up tight ends to man the spot when they use them. Could mark Weisman make a team...yes. But to do that even if every team carries a FB he would need to be one of the 32 best in the nfl and I think that he may struggle with that as he hasn't played a true FB in a few years. Hopefully he makes it but I would bet even he isn't banking on it.Someone a couple years ago posted on this board that fullbacks dont play much in the NFL but that is just crap if you watch games. There are still a lot of I formation plays with QB under center and a fullback leading the tailback, or the fullback slipping out to catch a pass, or staying in to block.MWeisman hardly gets thrown to at Iowa so he really needs to work on that but I think he has shown good pass catching ability. He is durable, probably pretty smart, strong and a good blocker.Can he be a good blocker and tackler on special teams where you have to play with only a 53+ man roster?
Where is the board protocol saying that threads have to be in response to other threads?
Thought there was discussion about Weisman being a liability and wanted to read the thread. Didn't know someone would make a negative out of whole cloth to respond to something that wasn't there.
I ask a legit question and get a smarmy-*** answer. Your cool.You win the "stupid reply of the day" award. People have made negative comments about him in more than 1 game thread. And in some non-game threads. But you keep pretending otherwise and showing how little you actually read. I've been a lurker for years and apparently you fell off the turnip truck 6 hours ago.
All 3 TDs were outside zones when I rewatched. I could have been mistaken but looked very much like it. I know it is only 3 but most of his best runs all day came from the oz.We can all find examples, but they are outliers as it relates to Weisman's running success. Just because you find a quarter it doesn't mean you're a millionaire
I ask a legit question and get a smarmy-*** answer. Your cool.
I don't follow game threads. I don't read every thread. Those two make me stupid, I know. I read this thread because I thought this was a response to Weisman bashing. I was wrong. Props to you. And props to you for your admisstion that you've been "a lurker for years".
No need to explain yourself more, dood. I get it, your Hawkfan superhero Mysteron.
Every superhero needs a superhero talent and you've admitted yours.
Lurking.
All 3 TDs were outside zones when I rewatched. I could have been mistaken but looked very much like it. I know it is only 3 but most of his best runs all day came from the oz.
When linemen are covered up the zone scheme looks a lot like man. Watch their initial step and you can see the linemen all go laterally to play side. This is an indication of zone. Because the FB goes play side it has to be outside zone or stretch. Since the rb and fb aim for the te it is outside zone. The fb has the job of helping to secure the man on the te and/or attack the lb depending on how the defense reacts.The key is watching the linemen and their initial step man blocking is more forward with the first step while zone is more lateral or bucket stepping. Zone plays do not need to be single back. Power has the FB kick out the de and a guard lead up the hole.ISO has the linemen step to the hole meaning some will step with left foot and some with right foot first. All of the linemen make the same step unless they are uncovered and how uncovered players react tells you whether they are using basic zone or pin and pull technique or another zone technique. I coach zone and man blocking and study both and get as much info on both as I can. It is definitely zone.Being an old coach, I wouldn't refer to those as outside zones (one back). Iowa was lined up in the I for all three TDs and the fullback lead Weisman through the hole. To me they were more of a power/iso play.